Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why are they claiming they will keep their guns if the law changes? If you own a gun and law changes to make that particular weapon illegal, than keeping it is NOT responsible.
I keep hearing how responsible these gun owners are-- Yet when faced with actual gun crime, they abdicate responsibility. When faced with a possible change in law which may illegalize assault rifles, they will do the OPPOSITE of what's responsible and retain their illegal weapons.
Blind adherence to tyrannical laws is not being responsible.
Why are they claiming they will keep their guns if the law changes? If you own a gun and law changes to make that particular weapon illegal, than keeping it is NOT responsible.
I keep hearing how responsible these gun owners are-- Yet when faced with actual gun crime, they abdicate responsibility. When faced with a possible change in law which may illegalize assault rifles, they will do the OPPOSITE of what's responsible and retain their illegal weapons.
No. It's irresponsible to break the law. And you don't get to determine which ones you like and which ones you don't.
If gun owners are responsible, they will follow the law... Not hide their illegal weapons of war.
But, it's o.k. for a criminal....
What is so sad, is that you are raging against law abiding gun owners...but yet could care less about those criminals who have guns....who don't care about the law....don't worry about what a law abiding gun owner would do if needed....
[quote=SamBarrow;27381925There's a difference between being responsible and obeying unjust laws (whether that diagnosis in realistic or not).[/quote]
No there isn't. To disobey a law one disagrees with creates anarchy, which automatically is irresponsible.
Now if one wishes to continue working to elect representatives who would overturn (legally) the new law, that is responsible. But in the interim, one cannot be a lawbreaker and responsible. They are mutually exclusive.
Why are they claiming they will keep their guns if the law changes? If you own a gun and law changes to make that particular weapon illegal, than keeping it is NOT responsible.
I keep hearing how responsible these gun owners are-- Yet when faced with actual gun crime, they abdicate responsibility. When faced with a possible change in law which may illegalize assault rifles, they will do the OPPOSITE of what's responsible and retain their illegal weapons.
Change the Constitution and then I will comply. Just because a there is a law, doesn't make it Constitutional.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
