Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-08-2013, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
5,638 posts, read 6,522,222 times
Reputation: 7220

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by artisan4 View Post
'Gun Grabbers' sounds like a porno flick.
It does, and so does Big Guns Part III.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2013, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,301,323 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlandochuck1 View Post
How about private gifts? If I want to give my gun to my daughter, will we have to go through some beaurocratic crap and I'll have to pay a fee?
If the grabbers get their way about all this that is just what you will have to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2013, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,301,323 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
I have read plenty about how back ground check will help? The same link you have provided (that I also provided earlier) states that 500 guns are stolen on a daily basis.

Now, you tell me how those 500,000 guns a year that are stolen....will be held to these standards that you want?
All the grabbers want is a method of knowing who should have the gun. They don't think at all about gun violence, just want to make it harder to buy and give the government an address of every owner so they can go door to door looking. Since our AG and President have said that due process is not necessary they will be able to force their way in to look around the house. I wonder if they would even try to find out if the present resident is the one who bought a gun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2013, 08:35 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,371 posts, read 47,120,861 times
Reputation: 34107
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
WHY ON EARTH would you have to pay for a background check for EACH GUN you're buying, when you're buying more than one in a single transaction?!?!

Single transaction!

Get it?!?!?!?

What, do you think something's going to change in the database in the five minutes between phone calls?

OMFG!
Which goes back to my first point. These guys don't care about reducing violence. It's all about how much crap they can push forward against law abiding owners. They are so afraid of guns they will do anything to make it harder to own one. They are more afraid of a weapon then the criminal that may harm them, even with bare hands or a knife.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2013, 08:37 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,273,299 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
If someone buys a gun for you in another state that has lax laws and then gives or sells it to you without proper checks, that should be illegal and if that gun is used in a crime the person who gave you the gun should also be charged for the crime.
What you are talking about is called a straw purchase and that is already illegal... Practically everything angle has a law, but the enforcement is lax not the laws. What if the gun is stolen though? If a stolen gun is used in a crime should the former owner be charged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac_Muz View Post
If you are dealing with NICS it is a Federal BC and they will contact every state you ever bought a gun in. That one instant call gets it...... BC is not exactly a state by state thing but then is is....

NICS does it all at once.... If a state like say MASS hangs up a buyer because agents don't feel like they want to work that day, then the LAW says if in x time (I forget) the buyer gets the gun anyway..

Unless you get denied by NICS you get the gun(S)

urbanlife is a kook, and like most gun grabbers refuses to even try to understand... It;s simple really.

The grabbers think they can get a certain type of class gun and they can't. but you can't make them understand, and the gun they want most is hand guns..

They won't admit to that for the moment, but I bet you know better just like me.
Urbanlife is usually pretty moderate on guns. He may not be informed on how many different laws there are and I haven't seen him say any guns should be banned, but he does want background checks. Most people do though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Universal background checks would make it easier to catch these people.
How will a universal background check catch a straw purchaser? You can only buy a gun in the state you reside in. The background check goes through the FBI. If you buy a gun online or from another state then the seller has to ship the gun to a dealer in your state to complete the transaction (background check, paperwork, etc.). You can't buy a gun if you have a felony, drug or alcohol problems, a court adjudicated you mentally ill, you have a current criminal charge, a DV charge, owe child support, and countless other disqualifying factor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I think a dealer should be under even more strict laws and should have to prove every sale and purchase they make to prevent them from selling and buying guns illegally.
Dealers are already under extremely strict laws though. It is very difficult to get a FFL and that license can be revoked if you violate the laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2013, 08:38 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,982,885 times
Reputation: 7365
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionking View Post
Yes that and a FFL must keep good records of transaction because if the BATF come to inspect ( and they do) and find something off the FFL will be in a heap of trouble.
Yeah I know. I used to work as a FFL dealer's clerk. I entered guns off the UPS trucks as they came in and logged them out on the other book and placed the 4473 forms in the file cabinets locking them up. I had to pass a different BC and be finger printed like a criminal to take that job.

These little whiners have no idea and think they have an original thought and no laws exist...

Little and I do mean little do they know what laws there are....

For example the Mass State gun law book being 25,000 pages thick of nothing but jibberish judges can't understand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2013, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Here
11,579 posts, read 13,960,029 times
Reputation: 7009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac_Muz View Post
Yeah I know. I used to work as a FFL dealer's clerk. I entered guns off the UPS trucks as they came in and logged them out on the other book and placed the 4473 forms in the file cabinets locking them up. I had to pass a different BC and be finger printed like a criminal to take that job.

These little whiners have no idea and think they have an original thought and no laws exist...

Little and I do mean little do they know what laws there are....

For example the Mass State gun law book being 25,000 pages thick of nothing but jibberish judges can't understand.
The clueless anti-gun folks probably think buying guns is like buying anything else. Walk into the store, load up your cart with firearms and ammo and head on over to the self-checkout line.

Would you like paper or plastic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2013, 10:15 PM
 
22,666 posts, read 24,632,000 times
Reputation: 20353
Well, if you are in Californiatard....wait for a while, they are going back to Muskets/Flintlocks only!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2013, 01:04 AM
 
1,730 posts, read 1,363,714 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Which goes back to my first point. These guys don't care about reducing violence. It's all about how much crap they can push forward against law abiding owners. They are so afraid of guns they will do anything to make it harder to own one. They are more afraid of a weapon then the criminal that may harm them, even with bare hands or a knife.
Plus they don't even want to protect their families.
Scared, they hate their spouses and kids, take your pick.
Sad people indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2013, 01:20 PM
 
46,978 posts, read 26,041,916 times
Reputation: 29470
Why am I suddenly reminded of the Beanie Baby craze?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top