Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Democrats obsession with "Watergate" was far worse. Hearings to take down a president because a few over-zealous supporters decided to bug their oppositions campaign headquarters.
Um, no. Watergate actually involved President Nixon, and included burglary, bribery, perjury, political espionage, revenge against whistle lowers, and conspiracy to murder. Essentially everyone in the House of Representitives was going to vote to impeach Nixon, and the Senate was certain to convict him, which is why he resigned before the vote could be taken.
Meanwhile, there is no evidence, at all, of wrongdoing on the part of the President, and all signs point to him responding appropriately to the attacks.
Bush did not lie and at least the government cared and run a full inquirey into 911 . Bush hid nothing
Yet you say its ok for Obama to hide
Lied or mislead, same end result. And 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq (even though the Bush administration wanted it to) so I'm not sure why you brought that up.
Lied or mislead, same end result. And 9/11 had nothing to do with Iraq (even though the Bush administration wanted it to) so I'm not sure why you brought that up.
Clinton beleived he had WMD befor Bush ever became president was Clinton mislead
Clinton beleived he had WMD befor Bush ever became president was Clinton mislead
Yeah, I'm not going to bother debating someone who can't form a coherent sentence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.