Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-06-2014, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,604,210 times
Reputation: 7801

Advertisements

In my lifetime, yes.

 
Old 02-06-2014, 04:25 PM
 
1,855 posts, read 3,611,284 times
Reputation: 2151
Ross perot is hardly representative of the GOP and big business, so FAIL. See my subsequent post in which I provide the numbers by party who voted for these trade deals. Hint: the GOP supported both Nafta and China Act, the Democrats rejected both (in the House). As far as which party receives the most contributions from corporate America, that is not even in dispute--at least for anyone with access to a search engine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
1) That's not true. Both parties get donations from big business. and
2) Clinton was the president. He not only signed NAFTA into law and increased trade with China, he also fought very hard for those programs. Go to youtube and watch Al Gore and Ross Perot debate NAFTA. Perot was absolutely right in that debate, but the media treated like a bumpkin who was schooled by Al Gore. Al Gore was absolutely insufferable in that debate - a condescending d-bag who was absolutely wrong, as time has shown.
 
Old 02-06-2014, 05:08 PM
 
7,492 posts, read 11,833,754 times
Reputation: 7394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tele-Cat View Post
Something different and better than Bush and Cheney did. That whole administration, even Powell, should be tried, convicted and executed for war crimes.
Why? For going after terrorists???
 
Old 02-06-2014, 05:43 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,318,915 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbuskidd92 View Post

Lets talk about it.
No. Reagan was. Followed by George W. Bush (though he was no Reagan, he was a damn site better than either Clinton or Obamaa). Obama is a total flop.
 
Old 02-06-2014, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,422,622 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
No. Reagan was. Followed by George W. Bush (though he was no Reagan, he was a damn site better than either Clinton or Obamaa). Obama is a total flop.
Welcome to Fantasyland.
 
Old 02-06-2014, 08:51 PM
 
Location: 53179
14,416 posts, read 22,496,229 times
Reputation: 14479
Better than Obama and and **** as Bush
 
Old 02-06-2014, 08:57 PM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,853,757 times
Reputation: 17241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Columbuskidd92
Lets talk about it.
Yes lets
 
Old 02-06-2014, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,902,028 times
Reputation: 4512
Yes. And I'm a conservative libertarian. I don't agree with him on everything, but him and his republican congress made a great team in creating a surplus
 
Old 02-06-2014, 10:00 PM
 
32,072 posts, read 15,077,213 times
Reputation: 13694
I think this country prospered very well under Clinton.
 
Old 02-06-2014, 10:35 PM
 
21,481 posts, read 10,585,771 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
Ross perot is hardly representative of the GOP and big business, so FAIL. See my subsequent post in which I provide the numbers by party who voted for these trade deals. Hint: the GOP supported both Nafta and China Act, the Democrats rejected both (in the House). As far as which party receives the most contributions from corporate America, that is not even in dispute--at least for anyone with access to a search engine.
I know the GOP wanted NAFTA and the China Act. My point was that Clinton, a Democratic president when these acts were passed and the topic of the OP, not only signed those deals into law, he actively fought for them. He had the power to stop those agreements from becoming law, and he didn't do that. Instead, his administration did what they could to get those trade deals.

I never said Ross Perot was representative of the GOP, so I have no clue what you're talking about. I only mentioned Perot in the context of Clinton's Vice President debating Perot on the very topic of NAFTA. Perot correctly said that without forcing the other countries to pay equitable wages to workers as American companies, there would be a giant sucking sound of jobs going to other countries. As a billionaire businessman himself, Perot actually knew whereof he spoke.

If the true intent of the trade deal was to raise Mexico up and make North America more competitive with the new European Union, then it would have been better to have those guarantees. Of course, the China deal was just a bad deal all around, except for the Chinese government and corporations. Now we get cheaper prices on goods, but the goods aren't good (better for them and businesses as a consumer economy must continue to buy new gadgets). I remember all the politicians and think tanks saying we were moving from a manufacturing economy to the brains behind the economy, all the while forgetting that not everyone in America is able to work in high tech or finance or the housing market (and look how that turned out?). There is an increase in immigrants to take the leftover jobs available to those people. If you don't think that's true, try getting a job on a construction crew, window washing, landscaping service, garbage collection, etc. in a border state if you're a non-Spanish speaking white or black. Now they've outsourced manufacturing, call centers, etc., and there's even a push to increase visas for foreigners to take the "brainy" jobs we were supposed to get from all those free trade agreements.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top