Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-29-2013, 06:28 PM
 
13,806 posts, read 9,700,705 times
Reputation: 5243

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
And if it snows, its racism, if a black man has flat tire, its racism...broken record....we dont care...every time its always racism......the white guilt well is closed...ran dry...never to be refilled..
That is what you all try to do. You try to camouflage the real reality of racism by claiming that we see EVERYTHING as racism. It's like a magicians trick.......to get people to look away from the truth of the matter. You want the audience to focus on the inaccurate claims of racism....to hide the real racism. I mean, there is a 300 + year record of evidence on racism....which is kind of hard to hide under your sleeve....but dam if you all don't try.

The broken record is the old tired magicians tricks.

 
Old 09-29-2013, 06:38 PM
 
13,806 posts, read 9,700,705 times
Reputation: 5243
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
Stop ducking. What they did not like was their skin color. The white decline began in 1950 and continued at very close to the same rate until today when there are very few whites left. The black population continued to increase until almost the 70s when it to began to decline.

I know of lots of cities with a history of corrupt politicians but I am aware of none that lost population over the isse.
Actually the black population of Detroit peaked in 2001 at ~ 790,000. The poor economy and the national sub prime housing fiasco, liar loans, CDO's, relaxed lending standards and the like, radically altered residential trends in regards to race, not only in the Detroit area, but all over the nation. Whites wanted to move out of inner-ring suburbs because they could move up into bigger homes and lots further out....but they needed people to buy their existing homes. Inner ring suburbs was a move up only for people in the city who were then approved for loans in these inner ring suburbs that they could previously hardly get into. That is why there was this large decline in black population in the principle cities all across the Midwest.
 
Old 09-29-2013, 06:38 PM
 
Location: west mich
5,739 posts, read 6,931,116 times
Reputation: 2130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Leftist thieves killed Detroit.
People moved because the politicians and their voters were robbing them.
Wow, not a clue eh? Is Fox "News" big there in Pittsburgh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
Minnesota and Massachusetts are very leftist and aren't in nearly as bad of shape as Michigan. Minnesota has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the nation.
And Massachussetts has Romneycare, which residents like and which repubs now dodge.

Romneycare

Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
No --- it was when Bill Clinton pushed through his free trade -- knowing full well that it would destroy cities like Detroit. Whites and middle class blacks left Detroit when the jobs left, even if only whites left but there were still good jobs, Detroit would be much better off.

The liberals did not stand up against Bill Clinton and his NAFTA and other free trade policies. The unions didn't do much either to keep jobs for the people. Liberal governors in Michigan didn't do anything to keep jobs there.
In fact Pat Buchanan was one of the only ones who spoke out against NAFTA, but liberals opposed him.
Do you read at all? Just one fascist Fox talking point after another is all you can offer up?
NAFTA was authored and signed by republicons pre-Clinton, and mostly repubs supported it. Clinton pushed nothing on poor defenseless repugs.
Your heroes Limbaugh, Fox, etal accused Clinton of "stealing" NAFTA from them. Helps to have a short attention span - as Fox well knows.
O'Reilly falsely claimed "[m]ost Republicans didn't want" NAFTA | Research | Media Matters for America

And what about your "Clinton-as-Marxist" talking point - what happened to that? You just etch-a-sketch it whenever convenient? You rightists are truly amazing.
If you are attempting to sway people toward the right, you are not earning your pay - seriously. Fox scripting won't do it.

Last edited by detwahDJ; 09-29-2013 at 06:58 PM..
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:02 PM
 
72,971 posts, read 62,554,457 times
Reputation: 21872
Quote:
And Massachussetts has Romneycare, which residents like and which repubs now dodge.
Ironic.
 
Old 11-02-2013, 03:09 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,457,935 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ View Post
If you are attempting to sway people toward the right, you are not earning your pay - seriously. Fox scripting won't do it.
Lol.....and you cite Media Matters as an unbiased source?

Clearly you jest!

-- Posted with TapaTalk
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top