Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-05-2013, 05:25 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,107,555 times
Reputation: 4828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
That means, once the office of the Secretary of State certifies the petition, he is recalled.
Sure, it would mean that if the article the OP linked to wasn't also lying. But it is, and it doesn't mean that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:33 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanek9freak View Post
Typical denverite. You all think that what Denver wants, the rest of the state wants. Reminds me of Chicago. Polls are skewed, of course, due in part to the massive population in metro Denver. Nobody in any other part of the state, except boulder county, supports any of these new gun laws.

I cringe when I hear you people say "common sense", because what you truly mean deep down inside is, "no guns for private citizens, military and police only". Don't even bother trying to deny it, I know your type.

And I know full well that the sheriffs represent the public's views, as they are after all, elected positions. People elect those who share their beliefs. At least in my case. I have voted for El Paso county sheriff Terry Maketa many times before, and I will continue to do so
in the future, because he represents my, and the vast majority of the county's interests.

Sigh. This was a great place to live 15 years ago. Old Colorado needs to make a comeback.
Cant wait to see that Collectivist fool get thrown out of office, while you guy are at it throw out hickicmlooper and vote in tom tancreto
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:48 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
7000 signatures were required. They got over 16,000.

Many petition drives fail to qualify for the ballot despite collecting many more signatures than the number required.

Many signatures are disqualified for not being registered voters or for technical deficiencies. The person in charge of verifying the signatures can sometimes make the difference in whether or not it gets on the ballot.

Sometimes people who are paid to collect signatures create fraudulent signatures which can't be verified and therefore get tossed out. This usually is NOT organizational fraud - it's individual fraud - but it can keep a petition from reaching the ballot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 06:40 AM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,947,399 times
Reputation: 2385
[quote=Darkatt;29886055]actually,

That means, once the office of the Secretary of State certifies the petition, he is recalled.
[quote]

Quote:
Laws governing recall in Colorado
The citizens of Colorado are granted the authority to perform a recall election by the Section 1 of Article 21 of the Colorado Constitution. Colorado is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, but it hasn't been clear whether federal courts would allow states to actually recall their federal politicians.[1]
Signature requirement

The number of valid signatures required to force a special recall election is 25% of the votes cast in the last election for the official being recalled.
Laws governing recall in Colorado - Ballotpedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 06:52 AM
 
Location: right here
4,160 posts, read 5,623,473 times
Reputation: 4929
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
Cant wait to see that Collectivist fool get thrown out of office, while you guy are at it throw out hickicmlooper and vote in tom tancreto

I would agree....I didn't think Hickenlooper was a bad mayor but he isn't that great of a governor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,170,222 times
Reputation: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Sure, it would mean that if the article the OP linked to wasn't also lying. But it is, and it doesn't mean that.
Here is a better cite then. I find no real difference between the linked article and the one in the Denver Post.

Battle ahead as Colorado Democrat John Morse fights gun-based recall - The Denver Post

Quote:
The organizers of an effort to recall Colorado Senate President John Morse turned in Monday more than twice the number of signatures required to force a special election, possibly setting the stage for an expensive, national battle over gun control.

If the signatures are determined to be valid and survive a court challenge, it's likely voters in Morse's Senate district will decide at a special election in September whether to oust the Colorado Springs Democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,810,305 times
Reputation: 35920
^^
Do note the quote from the Post says "force a special election".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 09:10 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,107,555 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
Here is a better cite then. I find no real difference between the linked article and the one in the Denver Post.

Battle ahead as Colorado Democrat John Morse fights gun-based recall - The Denver Post
There is a huge real difference. Try reading both articles more slowly and perhaps you'll see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,198,674 times
Reputation: 7875
I wouldn't be surprised if this forced a special election to recall the Senator, but that doesn't mean he won't be Senator, it just means he has to prevent from losing his seat.

If this election causes him to lose his seat, then you can claim that he has been recalled.


There was a Recall vote on Scott Walker and he is still a governor, therefore was never recalled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 10:22 PM
 
1,364 posts, read 1,929,680 times
Reputation: 1111
Sure the OP jumped the gun, but it's still great to see voters use the tactics to oust Scott Walker against politicians on the other side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top