Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-28-2013, 02:46 PM
 
808 posts, read 662,431 times
Reputation: 196

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
HR, bookkeeping, medical/legal transcribing, preparing tax returns are all off shored now.
The internet has led to this boom.
there is no medical transcribing anymore - the stupid big government with it's intrusion with making computerized charting ( it's a nightmare) killed those jobs.
And the patient safety
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2013, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,604,577 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by case44 View Post
OP says 4 out of 5. I say, under Obama, that number will increase to 6 out of 5.

I say it jokingly, but that, sadly, is Darth Barry's motive for our country. Government gets the spoils, and the rest of us get nothing. President plays more golf, and we end up living in a sewer.
I highly recommend you take control of you own life and claw your own way out of the sewer as opposed to counting on DC to pull you out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
I know stats can be twisted and such but anything close to this picture is sad as hell. I mean down in the dumps sad.
Here's AN EXAMPLE:

From the link: Nationwide, the count of America's poor remains stuck at a record number: 46.2 million, or 15 percent of the population

The population grows each year and therefore there are more poor people just as there are more wealthy people.

There was no formal definition of poverty prior to the 60's. Researchers have extrapolated historical figures based on the working poor, rural households and farmers. Children were not counted.

1870's-62%
1900-50%
1909- 44%

Prior to the 1930's, it has been estimated that child labor lifted 7-10% of families out of poverty.

1930's- 60% and 82% of all farmers
1940's -54%
1959-1962 's- 20-25%
1964- 19%
1967 - 30% of all seniors lived below poverty compared to 13% in 2008
2008- More than 75% of poor households are headed by single mothers. 22% of those living in poverty are under 18.

The poverty rate has not ( yet?) gone above 15.2 % since the 60's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 02:56 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,258,614 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Here's AN EXAMPLE:

From the link: Nationwide, the count of America's poor remains stuck at a record number: 46.2 million, or 15 percent of the population

The population grows each year and therefore there are more poor people just as there are more wealthy people.

There was no formal definition of poverty prior to the 60's. Researchers have extrapolated historical figures based on the working poor, rural households and farmers. Children were not counted.

1870's-62%
1900-50%
1909- 44%

Prior to the 1930's, it has been estimated that child labor lifted 7-10% of families out of poverty.

1930's- 60% and 82% of all farmers
1940's -54%
1959-1962 's- 20-25%
1964- 19%
1967 - 30% of all seniors lived below poverty compared to 13% in 2008
2008- More than 75% of poor households are headed by single mothers. 22% of those living in poverty are under 18.

The poverty rate has not ( yet?) gone above 15.2 % since the 60's.
And to put it into visual terms.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post

More like hardly working..........

"President Obama is playing his usual round of Saturday golf with his usual roundup of junior aides. He stopped briefly at the White House following his event at the Korean War Memorial today before heading out to the course at Fort Belvoir in Northern Virginia."
There are 435 elected representatives and 100 senators who officially work 126 days, this year.
What might they be up to today beyond contemplating their 5 week summer recess and fund raising for their reelection?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 03:03 PM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,238,278 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by jade408 View Post
New stats show that poverty is increasing for all americans, across all ethnic groups.

So much so, that 80% of people will have a period (at least 1 year) with joblessness and poverty.

Exclusive: 4 in 5 in US face near-poverty, no work - SFGate

This is very distressing, and really underscores the fact we need to find a permanent solution to eliminate, or reduce economic inequality. The problems of class mobility are especially heightened these days. And it doesn't matter what ethnic group you are in.
I don't know about that. I began working @ age 12 in a soda fountain and then as a merchandise checker @ Wiebolts, and was gainfully employed until recessions hit, and was out of a job for six months.

Wieboldt's - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Department Store Museum: Wieboldt's, Chicago, Illinois

I think many Americans go through this phase at least more than once in their lifetimes, that is periods of employment and periods of time "between jobs".

Recessions of the late 60's and early 70's.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recessi...969%E2%80%9370

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973%E2%80%9375_recession
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 03:04 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,677,756 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
And to put it into visual terms.
Yes, that's why the so-called "poor" now live in 2000 sq ft homes, can eat out in restaurants using food stamps, have internet, video game players, shop at stores in the mall, and live a very high standard of life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,859,449 times
Reputation: 28563
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Yes, that's why the so-called "poor" now live in 2000 sq ft homes, can eat out in restaurants using food stamps, have internet, video game players, shop at stores in the mall, and live a very high standard of life.

Really? Because I have yet to see evidence of those so-called "poor" people. The once I see are struggling in crappy neighborhoods, with jobs with decreasing hours, and no disposable income for even the most limited of luxuries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by tottie13 View Post
blue collar jobs need to come back fast.

How much more are you willing/able to pay for everything you buy to ensure that it's made in the USA by people earning a " living wage" with benefits?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,713,615 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by softblueyz View Post
Oh, please. The "it's Bush's fault". Fine. What exactly has Obama done in the past 5 years to fix what Bush broke?

Let's take it a step back even further and go back to Bill Clinton. If you can be honest, you will acknowledge that Bush inherited some of Clinton's mistakes. It takes time to find out that all these brilliant ideas that presidents came up were serious mistakes that had a huge impact on this country. We now know that outsourcing hurt the US. Anyone with a half a brain knew it was going to hurt the country to begin with. Who repealed the Glass-Steagall Act - how did that turn out for this country? Who benefitted from repealing it and who lost??

Obama, Bush, Clinton all work for the corporations and banks and give lip service to everyone else.

I'll wait for your response.
ALL that came before contributed to right now.
ALL that came before kicked the can into the future.

Maybe we can all join hands and blame the invention of the tractor. Prior to that , about 200 years ago, about 80% of the people worked to produce surplus food for the 20%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top