Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Find an article that actually makes your point, whatever it is.
My point is that whatever a terrorist associates himself with shouldn't catch the blame for the act. An angry person willing to commit unspeakable crimes is going to find an excuse for those crimes. Whether it's Islam, libertarianism, or something else, the PERSON is to blame, not whatever excuse they had for the crimes.
Now that I was overly clear hopefully everyone can be on the same page.
Well this is incredibly ironic in a dark, twisted way, given that the ultraconservatives and radical Muslims like to think they are polar opposites.
Among the material he had was a piece arguing 9/11 and the OKC bombings were government conspiracies, one about the "rape of our gun rights," one about white supremacy that stated, "Hitler had a point," and one deriding the use of drones in the Middle East.
So I guess the next logical step is for us to ban conservative libertarian immigration, and export those already here... you know, just like what we should do with Muslims... right? Right?
Are you equating libertarians with extremism now ?
You've lumped ultraconservatives, radical Muslims and libertarians into one "they are the enemy" pot.
What about the Independents ?
Socially, fundie Christians are just Muslim lite. They want their religion to control your life, but at least they won't kill you over it (anymore).
Radical Christians and Radical Muslims are kindred spirits , they just don't know it
Reminds me of the gang warfare in the US, gangbangers from the Crips are essentially identical to ganbangers from the Bloods, same background, same experiences, same values.
They just happen to be born in a different neighborhood, otherwise they would probably be good friends.
MEGA FAIL on your part for not even getting the premise of the thread.
You'll do better next time though, hun.
Oh I got your point just fine, everything policially to the right of Josef Stalin is bad and must be deamonized, it was pretty obvious.
The problem is you used flawed information and illogical arguments to try and make your point.
If the basic premise of your argument is flawed, then you can only build straw man arguments to support it, that is why you failed so miserably in your attack.
Well this is incredibly ironic in a dark, twisted way, given that the ultraconservatives and radical Muslims like to think they are polar opposites.
Among the material he had was a piece arguing 9/11 and the OKC bombings were government conspiracies, one about the "rape of our gun rights," one about white supremacy that stated, "Hitler had a point," and one deriding the use of drones in the Middle East.
So I guess the next logical step is for us to ban conservative libertarian immigration, and export those already here... you know, just like what we should do with Muslims... right? Right?
OMIGOD! And they put him on the cover iof Rolling Stone?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
