Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:22 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,264,758 times
Reputation: 3444

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
But libertarianism has a higher proportion of them.

A good number of white supremacists are atheists. At least the younger people in their 20s and 30s
Possibly, but I doubt it. There isn't anything within the libertarian platform that is intrinsically appealing to white supremacists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:25 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,681,455 times
Reputation: 3153
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Possibly, but I doubt it. There isn't anything within the libertarian platform that is intrinsically appealing to white supremacists.

Are you kidding me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:26 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post


All I am asking is that critics argue the actual tenants.

could you take your own advice when addressing liberals ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:28 PM
 
Location: South Portland, ME
893 posts, read 1,207,601 times
Reputation: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Are you kidding me?
How is the view that all people should have as much freedom as possible conductive of "white supremacist" values? White supremacists believe that other races are inferior and therefore should not be given the same rights as whites, which is the exact opposite of libertarian views.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,790,545 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
So what are the mechanisms for protecting a person's rights and ensuring the Golden Rule is being followed? Are we operating under the assumption that state and local governments, and your fellow man have the hearts of angels?
No that's your perception of believing we want to live in some fairytale existence. Do me a favor and apply laws to the equation, except they would be common laws, not laws of convenience and control.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
what, like gold? silver? oil? maize? a basket of metals?

and is this just your personal opinion, or are you suggesting it is a widely shared view among libertarians?

NO... jeez that's as myopic as it gets!

How about a basket of everything? It's so simple, yet few seem to grasp the concept.

Put all of our resources in a basket and set the known total value as the benchmark. Once the benchmark is set, that's what we have to base a commodity backed currency on. The only fluctuations in value would be the fluctuations in production. Value for value, not debt out of thin air.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,941,526 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
Everyone is extreme when compared to the opposite/differing belief.

Accomplishments have nothing to do with what we are discussing. You made that a talking point, which has somehow morphed into a stipulation.
The problem with that is Libertarians are not in the center, you missed that didn't ya or are you simply ignoring that fact.
I asked a SIMPLE question, I see you cannot name any accomplishments by any Libertarians even though they have been around for quite a few years now. Got it, Libertarians are all talk not walk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,790,545 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoulesMSU View Post
How is the view that all people should have as much freedom as possible conductive of "white supremacist" values? White supremacists believe that other races are inferior and therefore should not be given the same rights as whites, which is the exact opposite of libertarian views.

Don't even try to reason with this guy. There are 5000 supremacists in the country. If a few of them call themselves Libertarian, knownotinsky will label all of us supremacists. Seriously hopeless reasoning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,790,545 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
The problem with that is Libertarians are not in the center, you missed that didn't ya or are you simply ignoring that fact.
I asked a SIMPLE question, I see you cannot name any accomplishments by any Libertarians even though they have been around for quite a few years now. Got it, Libertarians are all talk not walk.
No, again, no!

I don't know any Libertarians who claim to be in the middle, except when compared to either party. I reiterate, it's you that has made accomplishments the crux of your discussion, and not anyone else in here.

You can repeat yourself as much as you'd like, but it won't change this fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:44 PM
 
4,130 posts, read 4,461,778 times
Reputation: 3041
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
Don't even try to reason with this guy. There are 5000 supremacists in the country. If a few of them call themselves Libertarian, knownotinsky will label all of us supremacists. Seriously hopeless reasoning.
Proof?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2013, 01:44 PM
 
Location: South Portland, ME
893 posts, read 1,207,601 times
Reputation: 902
Here's the thing about libertarianism - it takes the best of both current parties and it throws out the worst.

The 1960s really threw a wrench in American politics because it vastly corrupted both parties.

Prior to the 60s, the Republican party was actually fiscally conservative - they favored small government, few regulations, etc. It was an easy platform to get behind and is why there was a Republic president virtually every year from 1897 - 1933.

That was when Democratic / Socialist policies started to win elections because the Great Depression created a need for wealth redistribution, so people voted for the party that would do that. Democrats were then in office from 1933 - 1953.

Then in the 50s, the Depression and War was over, so it started to tilt back into Republican presidents - people preferred less socialist policies... up until the 60s when everything changed.

See, during the civil rights movement, the Republican Party stupidly championed the anti-rights platform. This lead a ton of people who previously supported them (who believed in small government) to leave and to vote Democrat instead. The problem with this was that by voting Democrat, they were unintentionally supporting Democrat financial policies of lots of spending, big government, etc.

Meanwhile, many racist Democrats also switched parties, and they started to vote Republican just because they opposed civil rights. In fact, all of the southern states used to be primarily Democrat before the 1960s and suddenly they became primarily Republican after. What changed was not their view on the size of the government (they still favored large government), it was simply their view on civil rights.

So all of a sudden the country went from having 1 small government party (Republicans) and 1 big government party (Democrats) to having TWO big government parties where the only difference was whether you were a racist or not.

That has essentially been how the parties have differed ever since - for the past 50 years!

But the thing is, people are starting to realize that it's better to have small government - but there's no party for them to go to. Some have been trying to steer the Republican Party back on course, but it's been too corrupted by the racists. So, since that effort mostly failed, the effort has gone into creating a brand new party - the Libertarian Party.

As I said at the top, this takes the best of both - it focuses on small government but it also says "we're not a bunch of racist *******s either". Basically, the concept is the same as the pre-1960s Republican Party, except new and improved: Pro-freedom but without religious or racist intolerance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top