Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-11-2013, 03:49 PM
 
4,130 posts, read 4,461,778 times
Reputation: 3041

Advertisements

I love it when OP's don't read their own evidence.

 
Old 12-11-2013, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
How dare he take and post a photo of Dear Leader that portrays him in a negative light.

Is there ANY criminal charges that can be filed against the Photographer????????????
He didn't take a photo of Obama in a negative light, he just took a photo....and in this case, he took lots of photos.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,710,498 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
So why did he publish the photo, if it "no one cares about 'selfies?' I mean if he accidentally shot a photo of his shoes that no one cares about, would he publish that one too?
Is that really the question?

I mean it certainly isn't what the photographer was asking, or rather stating.

The real question, and it is a good one, is why did so many CHOOSE to focus on that one picture when there were 499 other pictures to focus on?
 
Old 12-11-2013, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,347,675 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Is that really the question?

I mean it certainly isn't what the photographer was asking, or rather stating.

The real question, and it is a good one, is why did so many CHOOSE to focus on that one picture when there were 499 other pictures to focus on?
Who knows? They must be racists.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 04:05 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
So why did he publish the photo, if it "no one cares about 'selfies?' I mean if he accidentally shot a photo of his shoes that no one cares about, would he publish that one too?

So another questions pops up here, does the photographer have any say in which photos get sent up the wire, so to speak, or does every shot he takes get sent thru no matter what?

“Obama/Cameron Selfie Photographer to TNR: I’m Ashamed of Mankind,” the New Republic reports today:
Roberto Schmidt is the AFP photographer, currently the agency’s chief photographer for South Asia, who captured that infamous snap. Reached by phone in South Africa, he sighed heavily. “Why do people care about a selfie?” he said. “This is a sad reflection of our society.” He’d gone to photograph the memorial with a team of ten photographers. They moved some 500 images on the wire. “Good images, nice, strong images,” he said. “Images of South Africans dancing, smiling, chanting, which is the way they express mourning for a man they consider to be their father.” It was a long ceremony; he took many photographs of world leaders giving speeches and South Africans grieving. And suddenly he saw the Danish prime minister lift her phone to take a photo of her face alongside seatmates Obama and Cameron. Schmidt dutifully clicked away. “They’re in front of you, this happens, you take the picture,” he said. “But I saw so many good images from that memorial. And the picture that’s getting played is the president in a selfie. That’s kind of a bummer.”


They must have not been paid for the rights to the photo. Or they now wish they had charged more for it.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
They must have not been paid for the rights to the photo. Or they now wish they had charged more for it.
Who wouldn't want to charge a lot of money for a random photo that the right wingers want to foam at the mouth for.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
It's not everyday you see the President of the United States acting like a 12 year old at recess.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 04:14 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,037,907 times
Reputation: 3603
The guy is an idiot. Dont take us for fools. Our eyes didnt deceive us. She was obviously annoyed or upset about something. Probably at the way her husband and new pals were behaving like 14 year old girls at a memorial service.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 04:17 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,037,907 times
Reputation: 3603
Something else you can take from all this, besides Obama being a disrespectful 14 year old girl, is how everyone loved to beat up on Bush and the constant "Bush is such an idiot, he is so foolish...". Well, from just that one service, sure seemed to me that it was Bush and even the damn Clintons, who behaved themselves, while our despicable President looked like an immature, ridiculous fool.
 
Old 12-11-2013, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's not everyday you see the President of the United States acting like a 12 year old at recess.
You mean President Bush posing next to Bono like a giddy fanboy? I thought that photo looked fine.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top