Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The same is true if the female in question isnt wearing panties.
Anti life equality folks think that stuff like this just happens.
Nope. Decisions have to be made and people should be responsible for their choices.
Answer the question. I'm not sure anyone has, and I'm not sifting through dozens of pages of religious scripture quoting and flag waving to see:
Do you support the death penalty and/or life imprisonment for women who get an abortion, and boyfriends who facilitate or pay for same?
If you do not, then YOU YOURSELF do not actually hold the life of a zygote to the same standard as the life of an already born person.
You MUST have as big a penalty for the abortion of a 2 week old fetus as a 2 year old baby if you insist on characterizing the issue as "life equality." Since there is no statute of limitations on murder, you would also probably have to round up the millions of mothers and boyfriends/husbands who have obtained an abortion.
You MUST have as big a penalty for the abortion of a 2 week old fetus as a 2 year old baby if you insist on characterizing the issue as "life equality." Since there is no statute of limitations on murder, you would also probably have to round up the millions of mothers and boyfriends/husbands who have obtained an abortion.
There is simply no way around it.
Abortion is legal. Are you suggesting that the law, if changed, can be applied retroactively?
Since murder is illegal in all 50 states, why is it legal to destroy human life inside the womb within those states?
Because at some point during the nine months of gestation, something that it obviously not a human being (i.e. a fertilized ovum) becomes something that obviously is a human being (i.e. a full term fetus). During much of that time, it is not obviously either. Therefore any attempt to draw a line where a transition from not human being to human being takes place is completely arbitrary.
Abortion law must err conservatively, but not stupidly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
If you support such destruction, then why are you against equal rights for all?
Assumes facts not in evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
Let's create life equality!
Perhaps if life were equal, that would make more sense.
What's so magic about the number 20? C'mon, now, really...at 19 weeks it's ok to kill it, but at 20 weeks it's not? How about our definition of when a human life is "over" in terms of "usefulness".
As just pointed out, all such lines are arbitrary.
Your definition of "when a human life is 'over'" is a tendentious strawman, unworthy of serious consideration.
Since murder is illegal in all 50 states, why is it legal to destroy human life inside the womb within those states?
If you support such destruction, then why are you against equal rights for all?
Let's create life equality!
You want to create life equality, do you root for prisoners on death row? We have a lot of unwanted children living in the US, what should we do with them? How many orphan children have you adopted?
I think it's mean you've kept Charlie Manson locked up all these years. Please release him. He's a human being and I'll let him sleep on my couch."
Sincerely, Harrier"
Charles Manson never killed anyone, to our knowledge.
Why should he be in prison?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.