Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The question was not just directed to you. It was directed to the entire board or those that fancy themselves supporters of your ridiculous concept of "life equality."
REGARDLESS of what the punishment is, do you support treating women who get abortions, men who drive girlfriends to get abortions, abortion doctors, and even people who lend money to someone to get abortion as first degree murderers, conspirators to commit murder, accessory to murder, etc.?
If abortion is murder, than a woman who obtains one deserves the same treatment as a woman who boards a school bus and shoots a kid dead.
Well, Harrier is a bit confused with the "treatment" part.
So what are you going to do with Charlie? How about the Ted Bundys? Bundy brutally killed multiple women. Was arrested. Escaped. And went back to brutally murdering women. And a young girl.
Since you don't believe in prisons, never mind the death penalty, what are you going to do with all the raping murderers? Put them next door to your female relatives?
You don't want prisons, you don't want capitol punishment, you don't want life sentences but you have absolutely NO idea what should be done with raping murderers. If you figure out what should be done with murderers and rapists and the people who murder their kids...... let everyone know.
You don't want prisons, you don't want capitol punishment, you don't want life sentences but you have absolutely NO idea what should be done with raping murderers.
Sure he does, they should be stopped in the course of their actions.
Government need not be involved.
If people would man/woman up, start defending themselves, instead of begging the government to protect them, then such low-lifes would get the message that they can't do such evil things.
Capital punishment is too final - it allows innocent people to end up being executed.
Life imprisonment is cruel and unusual punishment, and thus unconstitutional.
Imprisonment is not a deterrent - we have been doing so here in the United States for over 235 years and we still have murders and rapists among us.
Summary execution at the time of the assault by the intended victim would be effective, as would less deadly intervention such as disarming someone or rendering their attack impotent.
Summary execution at the time of the assault by the intended victim would be effective, as would less deadly intervention such as disarming someone or rendering their attack impotent.
So much for the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The Gestapo, however, would be proud of your love of summary execution. As would the head of the NRA.
You don't believe in life, BTW. You believe in forcing women to be pregnant. But you are NOT pro-life. You are anti-choice and anti woman. Lol, I'm so done with this thread. (BTW: You've left every child who is killed by a parent without justice. Five year old's can't pull out a gun to shoot the parent who is murdering them.)
Last edited by DewDropInn; 01-18-2014 at 02:48 PM..
, a
Sure he does, they should be stopped in the course of their actions.
Government need not be involved.
If people would man/woman up, start defending themselves, instead of begging the government to protect them, then such low-lifes would get the message that they can't do such evil things.
Capital punishment is too final - it allows innocent people to end up being executed.
Life imprisonment is cruel and unusual punishment, and thus unconstitutional.
Imprisonment is not a deterrent - we have been doing so here in the United States for over 235 years and we still have murders and rapists among us.
Summary execution at the time of the assault by the intended victim would be effective,as would less deadly intervention such as disarming someone or rendering their attack impotent.
THAT's your solution?
Only the strong survive? We should live like savages?
In your world, pedophiles would have free reign, after all, their victims don't have the ability to stop them. Way to go Harrier.
In your world, pedophiles would have free reign, after all, their victims don't have the ability to stop them. Way to go Harrier.
Pedophiles wouldn't have victims if parents(whom are increasingly deemed irrelevant by the left) would do their job and protect and educate their children, rather then abdicating such responsibilities to the government.
By the way, you are way to dismissive of the ability of some children to engage in self defense, and you give pedophiles(of all people) too much credit for their powers of exercising control over children.
Keep your mind open, and don't place artificial limitations on your thinking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
