Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Right. It would be a terrible thing for your ego if you read REAL science.
Maybe you should read real science.
The following from another poster states it perfectly
The global warming enthusiasts claim the high ground of science and suggest that they support scientific principles, when in fact, the opposite is true. Global warming enthusiasts break the basic core principle of any scientific hypothesis:
DISPROVE THE NULL HYPOTHESIS
Further, the global warming crowd attacks and villifies data that conflicts with thier views:
REAL SCIENCE WELCOMES FURTHER INQUIRY
The global warming cult uses emotional propaganda to press thier point:
REAL SCIENCE IS INDIFFERENT TO OUTCOME AND IS ONLY INTERESTED IN A VALID ANALYSIS
Don't even suggest that you are "pro-science" when advocating "global warming", as you stand soundly on the side of those dismissing evolution, theory of relativity, string theory, and those suggesting vaccinations are harmful to mankind. You are in the "flat earth" camp and oppose sound science.
If global warming has been debunked why do so many conservatives still want to discuss it?
And to the idiot above using the term "environazi": when you need to call the other side Hitler you have just outed yourself as an intellectual featherweight.
Watch. Next summer will be another hot one, and drought will spread.
The western half of the country is bone dry and warmer than average of January.
Since the earth is tilted on it's axis, we will always have cold winters. Winters growing colder is the other side of earth growing warmer. Expect extremes of both heat and cold to become the new normal.
The following from another poster states it perfectly
The global warming enthusiasts claim the high ground of science and suggest that they support scientific principles, when in fact, the opposite is true. Global warming enthusiasts break the basic core principle of any scientific hypothesis:
DISPROVE THE NULL HYPOTHESIS
Further, the global warming crowd attacks and villifies data that conflicts with thier views:
REAL SCIENCE WELCOMES FURTHER INQUIRY
The global warming cult uses emotional propaganda to press thier point:
REAL SCIENCE IS INDIFFERENT TO OUTCOME AND IS ONLY INTERESTED IN A VALID ANALYSIS
Don't even suggest that you are "pro-science" when advocating "global warming", as you stand soundly on the side of those dismissing evolution, theory of relativity, string theory, and those suggesting vaccinations are harmful to mankind. You are in the "flat earth" camp and oppose sound science.
You get an "A+" for your excellent description of of denialists....Kudos!
No, they describe their dataset if you care to read it.
They provide links to the papers referenced, you're free to find out for yourself.
Oh yeah, there was also all sorts of peer reviewed "papers" on the depletion of the ozone layer in the 70's as well. Big panic.
And today the ozone is strongest it's ever been measured.
Idiocy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
