Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-05-2014, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Most places have done away with the dollar menu. Charging a little bit more than their dollar menu isn't going to kill anyone...the food they are eating off that dollar menu might kill them though.
McD's still has it..called the $1 and more menu.
Taco Bell still has it.

Plenty still have it.
Even Denny's has gotten on the bandwagon with their $2, $3 and $5 breakfast menu items.
They can't get rid of them because corporate tells them they have to have these loss leaders.

Where did you read that most have gotten rid of them ?
Most want to and have complained to corporate about it but they can't.

If Yum generates $24K per employee and has to pay out $23K per employee ($15/hr) where they currently pay $12K per employee then just how much do you think "a little" really is ? That's $11K more per year per employee.

 
Old 02-05-2014, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
McD's still has it..called the $1 and more menu.
Taco Bell still has it.

Plenty still have it.
Even Denny's has gotten on the bandwagon with their $2, $3 and $5 breakfast menu items.
They can't get rid of them because corporate tells them they have to have these loss leaders.

Where did you read that most have gotten rid of them ?
Most want to and have complained to corporate about it but they can't.

If Yum generates $24K per employee and has to pay out $23K per employee ($15/hr) where they currently pay $12K per employee then just how much do you think "a little" really is ? That's $11K more per year per employee.
I don't know what Yum is or where those numbers you have come from, but they would still be making a profit correct?
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:20 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I don't know what Yum is or where those numbers you have come from, but they would still be making a profit correct?
Yum is the blood sucking corporation that operates Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut. They prey on and exploit mostly low wage workers.
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I don't know what Yum is or where those numbers you have come from, but they would still be making a profit correct?
What ? That's $1K GROSS profit per year you left them with and think that's just dandy.

They didn't pay any taxes yet.
They didn't pay for marketing yet.
They didn't pay off any loans yet.

That $1K is before any expenses/taxes.

Today they generate $12K gross per employee.

How can you talk business if you don't know about Yum Brands ?

Taco Bell, KFC, Pizza Hut are all Yum Brands.
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Yum is the blood sucking corporation that operates Taco Bell, KFC and Pizza Hut. They prey on and exploit mostly low wage workers.
It's still min wage.
They also go for the low end consumer so they don't generate a lot of revenue.
Taco Bell for example: target market is 18-34 males earning low wages.
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:27 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
What ? That's $1K GROSS profit per year you left them with and think that's just dandy.

They didn't pay any taxes yet.
They didn't pay for marketing yet.
They didn't pay off any loans yet.

That $1K is before any expenses/taxes.

Today they generate $12K gross per employee.

How can you talk business if you don't know about Yum Brands ?

Taco Bell, KFC, Pizza Hut are all Yum Brands.
Then they are operating an unsustainable business model and deserve to go bankrupt. We don't need business like this in America. They can move to other third world countries.
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Then they are operating an unsustainable business model and deserve to go bankrupt. We don't need business like this in America. They can move to other third world countries.
Only if you mandate them to $15/hour.
A company has to generate revenue doesn't it ?
You just doubled their employee expense without doing anything to GUARANTEE them revenue to cover it.

They are profitable today because they know how to manage their money which includes salaries.

You don't get to decide who profits and who doesn't.
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:32 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,822,024 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Then they are operating an unsustainable business model and deserve to go bankrupt. We don't need business like this in America. They can move to other third world countries.
What we definitely don't need in America is low cost food choices. How dare we provide affordable food.

Maybe we should just make the same food cost more, then it will be better.
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,165,825 times
Reputation: 21738
The Thread so far......

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
If you base it on 1938. Minimum wage was at its peak in 1968. But nice try with that weak attempt .
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Why are we paying less for minimum wage now than we were in 1968?
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Google inflation calculator and put in today's minimum wage and compare it to how much that is in 1968, and then look at the minimum wage in 1968 and tell me which one is a higher value, today's minimum wage or 1968's minimum wage?
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
The internet says you could have gotten a pair of jeans for less than $6 in 1968.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
The same reasons it has been raised in the past, inflation goes up and the wages try to keep up, unfortunately minimum wage lags far behind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Because inflation has gone up, thus the value of the minimum wage has gone down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And if you would go by the rate it was in 1968 and adjust for inflation, it would be almost $11/hr for minimum wage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
For the same reason it has been raised before, to keep up with inflation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
This country has raised minimum wage with the attempt to keep up with inflation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Raising the minimum wage is to make sure it is attempting to keep up with inflation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And if it kept up with inflation since 1968 it would be almost $11/hr now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Minimum wage in 1978 was $2.65/hr, if minimum wage kept up with inflation from that point it would be $9.47/hr today.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
The 80's was a bad decade for minimum wage seeing that it stayed $3.35 for about 9 years before getting a a $0.45 raise. Hardly what I would call keeping up with inflation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Minimum wage has not been keeping up with inflation, and it doesn't matter how much inflation went up during those years seeing inflation is higher today than it was in the late 70s.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
You say that, yet wages haven't kept up with inflation and the price of products and rent have gone up regardless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
1968 is the peak, minimum wage pay has been downhill since.

...70 pages of Left-Wingers singing Kum-ba-ya and chanting "inflation" (snicker) and even that wouldn't be so bad, except they have no clue what "inflation" is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Who is talking about feel good opinions,...
Obviously, you....

Mircea
 
Old 02-05-2014, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
First you all say they are sitting on piles of cash and hoarding their money.
I show you numbers to show they aren't.
And then you turn around and say "well then they deserve to go out of business" if they can't afford $15/hour.

You can't get blood from a stone.
The money really isn't there in these FF restaurants.

The money is at JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Gates Foundation, not in some FF franchise store.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top