Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:15 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,466,305 times
Reputation: 3142

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
It's meant to be wrong. It's pandering for the female vote by creating a system that would lead to endless litigation.

The devil is always in the details in these things. "The title sounds so good, how could anyone be against it?"

And then you read it and think about it and realize it's an election year stunt to make the other party look bad.
Just like the violence against women act. The liberals made a huge deal of conservatives voting No on renewing VAWA. Of course, they didn't mention that the Republicans had their own act to prevent domestic violence that simply stripped out any reference to gender or sexual orientation. It simply protected all victims equally. But a law that doesn't set up special categories for people doesn't offer opportunities for identity politics and pandering to different voting blocs.

And again with the Voting Rights Act. Liberals had a hissy fit over conservatives wanting to destroy the voting rights act. When all they did was want one section struck down where out of 1,400 cases pertaining to that section 1,399 were passed without issue and the 1,400th case was passed after a review. So that section has actually accomplished precisely nothing. So when it comes to voter ID to prevent fraud, the liberals say there isn't enough fraud to worry about. But when not a single violation of that section of the voting rights act has been found ever in history, they scream bloody murder at removing that section. Again, done purely to create a wedge issue so they can scream about racism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,810,305 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
My point is a Master's does not help much in a lot of occupations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
NO, if you have a masters degree and im doing the exact same job with out one, that just means you paid alot of money for a degree you arent using... Or I have have excelled beyond my stated education.

Either way, you going to school longer does not mean you deserve more money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaten_Drinker View Post
Baloney. If both are doing EQUAL work, the employer is NOT benefiting from the "masters degree" so the employee does not warrant higher pay. There is no value to the employer thus no extra compensation.

I don't care about your masters degree in women's studies. You were hired to do "Job X" which has nothing to do with your degree.
I think you three don't have a master's. Look at what is being said on the ed forum, by those who do have one:

Quote:
Originally Posted by King_of_DC View Post
I have an MBA... it is from a 10 tier school... lol.

Funny though, no one every asks "where did you get your mba?" But I think my experience gets me ahead more than anything.... mba is simply icing on the cake. Solidifies my work... that and I went through with a gpa undergrad 4.0 / grad 3.9 (helped on my resume).

Far as your question, it depends... I went for an mba since I owned a business at the time... it helped. I ended up "going gov't" and it helped even more... mba is an mba. And I've worked with people with degrees all over...

When I was hired at the gov't, my mba helped me get $11,000 more per year than the other people hired without one. Within two years, I was making $15,000 more. At one point, I was making around $20,000 more than one guy. My mba has MORE than paid for itself.

I might be the exception though... I had a lot of experience before going gov't...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoma11 View Post
I have my MBA... honestly, it was more for me. I wanted to understand more indepth how the world works.

Getting a bump in pay once i graduated was a bonus. Also, i knew if i didn't get it while i as in my late 20's i'd be too lazy to get it after 30.
It IS common, in most of the work world, for more education to be rewarded, no matter what you Libertarians think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
I think you three don't have a master's. Look at what is being said on the ed forum, by those who do have one:





It IS common, in most of the work world, for more education to be rewarded, no matter what you Libertarians think.
But this fair pay act doesn't take education into account.
Equal work = equal pay

This fair pay act is about gender.

Public Sector jobs have a complete different salary/raise setup from private sector.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:39 PM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,506,441 times
Reputation: 1775
What it will lead to is the death of negotiated salary and benefits, because if females tend to negotiate less aggressively or seek benefits in lieu of salary it opens a company up to litigation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
If women are paid less for the same work, then one would think the working world would be full of women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,810,305 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcar Overkill View Post
What it will lead to is the death of negotiated salary and benefits, because if females tend to negotiate less aggressively or seek benefits in lieu of salary it opens a company up to litigation.
Only people who are represented by a labor union have much in the way of negotiated salary and benefits. The individual has very little power.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
If women are paid less for the same work, then one would think the working world would be full of women.
That's a cute talking point, but it is not reality. Even in teaching and nursing, men make more than women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,899,377 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
Lol! Why sure! The US is an economic powerhouse.
With no money.
At least our women are paid more, in comparison to men, than Canadian women.

The wage-gap | Students exploring inequality in Canada

Looks like Canadian women make less than 70% of what Canadian men make (as of 2009). Probably all that maternity leave is partly the cause of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Only people who are represented by a labor union have much in the way of negotiated salary and benefits. The individual has very little power.



That's a cute talking point, but it is not reality. Even in teaching and nursing, men make more than women.
Men make more because of additional coaching stipends.
But base salary is the same and is posted on every ISD website.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:54 PM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,506,441 times
Reputation: 1775
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Only people who are represented by a labor union have much in the way of negotiated salary and benefits. The individual has very little power.
That's not my experience, though I haven't looked into any studies on the issue.

I've negotiated my salary for every job I've had in the past 20 years, sometimes I even negotiate in order to keep an employer from losing me to a competitor. I negotiate and renegotiate every chance I get.

My wife just negotiated more time off in lieu of a raise, which would subject her employer to litigation if Paycheck fairness act were passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2014, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,331,642 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
At least our women are paid more, in comparison to men, than Canadian women.

The wage-gap | Students exploring inequality in Canada

Looks like Canadian women make less than 70% of what Canadian men make (as of 2009). Probably all that maternity leave is partly the cause of that.
Here you go. I'm making the exact same hourly wage as a man in my position. That being said, my total yearly earnings are less because I work less. I worked a lot less when my son was small.

Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being | University of Guelph
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top