Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2014, 10:01 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 26 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Thec term hedonistic encompasses straight relationships.
no clue what "hedonistic" means(googled it anyways)

but regardless of what it technically encompasses, that doesnt negate its use,or late there of, when it comes to straight people and their sexual exploits.

if a man holds a party and has a threesome with 2 other women, no one is going to use the word "lifestyle" to describe it. But replace those women with men and they will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2014, 01:03 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
no clue what "hedonistic" means(googled it anyways)

but regardless of what it technically encompasses, that doesnt negate its use,or late there of, when it comes to straight people and their sexual exploits.

if a man holds a party and has a threesome with 2 other women, no one is going to use the word "lifestyle" to describe it. But replace those women with men and they will.
"Lifestyle" is used for those who have more than one wife all the time. (even if they are simply wives in name only). They even use the word to describe themselves.

"This is the lifestyle we have chosen to live"

Polygamy as Lifestyle Choice, and a Reality TV Brand

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/us...name.html?_r=0

People need to quit being so touchy over a word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2014, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,899,377 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
no clue what "hedonistic" means(googled it anyways)

but regardless of what it technically encompasses, that doesnt negate its use,or late there of, when it comes to straight people and their sexual exploits.

if a man holds a party and has a threesome with 2 other women, no one is going to use the word "lifestyle" to describe it. But replace those women with men and they will.
Wrong.

Adult Swingers Personals Service and LifeStyle info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2014, 09:36 PM
 
4,213 posts, read 8,310,371 times
Reputation: 2681
While Bryan Singer is a very intellectual, rational, and polite person, he is also a sex crazed, compulsive, out of control maniac.

Do I know if he's raped this kid? No. But what I do know is he has used his talent, power, and money to manipulate, pillage, and destroy the dreams of young boys.

He's slept with probably thousands of young men and boys throughout the years. Now, some were probably gold diggers, some wanted a thrill to be with a "celebrity", some were probably rent boys. But there's no doubt a large number of young actors, maybe even straight ones, who were promised roles by him and were taken advantage of.

This is hardly unique to Singer, but it's a huge problem in Hollywood.

Look at Brad Renfro, Corey Haim, Corey Feldman. Just three examples and the living one is a mess. Two out of three are dead. All were molested and raped by Hollywood executives.

The problem just isn't Singer. He's created a mini empire of middle aged ephebophiles, some who don't have a penny to their name but latch on to his, that troll the greater LA area for young meat from small town USA to take advantage of.

If any of you on this site have children aspiring to be in Hollywood, don't send them to LA. Don't bother. You're better off sending them overseas to war. At least that's an honorable cause. What good is it to send your good looking son or daughter to LA just to be used and spit out by some sleazy exec?

Trust me, they're far more likely to get used by a Bryan Singer type than actually make it anywhere.

Good to see Singer is getting some exposure and punishment. It's only the tip of the iceberg for a far bigger pandemic. The pervesion of Hollywood.

Yes, you may say it goes far beyond Hollywood. Of course it does. But there's rarely an industry as powerful and perverse as Hollywood is. You won't be seeing this, for example, in Big Oil, Tobacco, Cars, Defense, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 03:15 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,485,034 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by disgruntled la native View Post
If any of you on this site have children aspiring to be in Hollywood, don't send them to LA. Don't bother. You're better off sending them overseas to war. At least that's an honorable cause. What good is it to send your good looking son or daughter to LA just to be used and spit out by some sleazy exec?
How is killing people a more "honorable cause" than getting and giving orgasms?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 04:12 AM
 
4,213 posts, read 8,310,371 times
Reputation: 2681
Giving and getting organisms by plying young people, often underage, with drugs and alcohol is better than fighting terrorists? Okay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,485,034 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by disgruntled la native View Post
Giving and getting organisms by plying young people, often underage, with drugs and alcohol is better than fighting terrorists? Okay.
Fighting terrorists, my eye. We are the terrorists.

I wouldn't support "plying" anyone with alcohol or drugs to get sex, but you know, sometimes people who want to have sex do choose to include alcohol or drugs in the experience, which is a different matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 09:28 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 26 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
"Lifestyle" is used for those who have more than one wife all the time. (even if they are simply wives in name only). They even use the word to describe themselves.

"This is the lifestyle we have chosen to live"

Polygamy as Lifestyle Choice, and a Reality TV Brand

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/us...name.html?_r=0

People need to quit being so touchy over a word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
We arent talking about swingers and people with multiple wives. EdwardA was talking about gay people in general, not The Director. Simply being gay. Thats the problem with both of your logic, and exactly why you are proving my point. The word lifestyle isnt applied to heterosexuality unless you are talking about the extremes and yet, its applied to all gay people regardless of the amount of partners.

Also, People on this site complain all the time about "political correctness", yet when when you get called out on it, all of a sudden, its being touchy over a word. pot meet kettle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 09:29 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 26 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by disgruntled la native View Post
Giving and getting organisms by plying young people, often underage, with drugs and alcohol is better than fighting terrorists? Okay.
Thats not the argument he was making. Nor where they often under aged, as one of the witness of the party has already stated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2014, 11:19 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
We arent talking about swingers and people with multiple wives. EdwardA was talking about gay people in general, not The Director. Simply being gay. Thats the problem with both of your logic, and exactly why you are proving my point. The word lifestyle isnt applied to heterosexuality unless you are talking about the extremes and yet, its applied to all gay people regardless of the amount of partners.
I'm not wrong about anything. You said it was only applied to those who are gay. As shown that isn't true. Now if you wanted to argue that people generally do this towards those who live outside of the general norm, I would agree with that but it's not necessarily a bad thing unless you are too touchy.

Friends of mine are always out camping. Out on the rivers with their kayaks. Fishing, rock climbing. They live an outdoor lifestyle.

Can some use it as a veiled way to try and offend? Sure, but if someone leads a "gay lifestyle" it's probably something based in a generalization but certainly not automatically a bad thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top