Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk
Well, you are wrong on all counts.
Your ideology IS the definition of immorality and it is indefensible.
|
They reward emotionalism and moralism and punish facts and reason.
They reward theft and laziness and punish work and success.
The reward illegal immigration and punish states that defend our border.
They reward incompetence and inexperience and punish competence and experience.
They reward indoctrination and lower standers and punish education and higher standards.
They reward pseudoscience and opinion and punish science and facts.
They reward technologies based on emotion and punish technologies based on fact and proven success.
The reward criminals and murders and punish law abiding citizens by actively trying to infringe on our Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
We all can not be wealth but we can all be made poor as not not offend those who are.
We all can not be smart and intelligence but we can all be made to be dumbed down as to not make the lowest common dominator upset.
We all can not be successful be we can all be made to be failures or have said successes curtailed or prevented as to not offend or upset those that failed.
We all can not be independent but we can all be made to be dependent as to not offend those who refuse to be independent.
We all can not be free and armed having the ability, means and will to defend our liberty, live, and property but we can all be made unsafe and disarmed lacking the ability, means and will to defend all we know and hold dear.
This quote sums it up very nicely.
"There is more slaves in New York and Pennsylvania than there is in Virginia and South Carolina and
they are the meanest kind of slaves; they are volunteer slaves...."-David Crockett
They have this self destructive urge to destroy everything of values they find.
"The modern liberal, there’s something about his ideology that leads him to invariably and inevitably side with evil over good, wrong over right, the lesser over the better, the ugly over the beautiful, the profane over the profound, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success."
"If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust." And there it is. "If no religion, no culture, no person, if no behavior, if no form of governance -- if nothing is better than anything else, then success is unjust. Why should a person, a nation, a government, religion succeed, if it’s not better than any other? So that liberalism says 'everything is equally good, man, coexist -- doesn’t make everything meet in the middle. It makes the better, bad."
If no religion or no culture or no person, if no behavior, if no form of government, if nothing is better than anything else, and that, by the way, manifests itself often in liberalism. It's how you arrive at believing success is unjust. Why should a person succeed, if that person's not better than anybody else? And a person can't succeed by being better because he's not permitted to be better, because that's unfair, that is itself unjust".
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
