Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-12-2014, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,552,145 times
Reputation: 6319

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickledpainter View Post
e130478 :"The refusal of certain people to acknowledge even the most obvious forms of American economic progress is absolutely astounding. There are people who actually think the BLS is defrauding the American people with "fake numbers." Hilarious."

Yup, government never lies.

Shadow Government Statistics - Home Page
How is that website any more trustworthy than the government's numbers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2014, 03:29 AM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,903,157 times
Reputation: 17353
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Obama has only signed one true anti-business legislation and that was Obamacare. The Keystone Pipeline couldn't go through the Senate before getting to his desk. As for what Republicans can do, can they tax companies who want to offshore businesses to other nations? Oh wait they can't because that is "anti-business... What is more important, appeasing business who can't vote or the people who feel the brunt of some pro-business legislation like a laxed EPA of encouraging offshoring.
Spoken like a true Obama supporter. Are you DENYING that Harry Reid is the dam that keeps the waters of the Congress from flowing to Obama's desk?

AND - It's like a deliberate refusal to admit that anti-business action and rhetoric doesn't DIRECTLY IMPACT "the people". For the LAST TIME: BUSINESS CREATES JOBS: NOT GOVERNMENT. So assault business all you want. And pay the price.

Even if your statement were TRUE, it's a lawyerly wordsmithing to misstate the issue.

1) Dodd-Frank wasn't "anti-business"? Sorry, every business on the face of the Earth will disagree with you including Obama friendly type businesses.

2) You don't have to "sign true anti-business legislation" to implement CHOKING REGULATIONS vis a vis creating thousands and thousands of UNELECTED BUREAUCRATIC regulations and massive regulatory intrusion.

HOW IRONIC - giving his newly announced "DEAL" with China choking THE USA about "climate change".

Are you denying that it's the entire POINT of Obama "working AROUND Congress" using agencies instead?

You don't think EPA regs impact business?
You don't think HHS regs impact business AND YOUR TAX DOLLARS even at a local school lunch program level?
You don't think DHS immigration activities impact business? OR SCHOOLS? OR your local COMMUNITY?
You don't think that sending a freaking TEAM of GOVERNMENT THUGS to RAID GIBSON GUITAR doesn't impact business.

You don't think the IRS TARGETING people's BUSINESSES because of their PERSONAL BELIEFS doesn't impact business? What about the chilling effect it has throughout the entire business community or EVEN the chilling effect Obama's massive control over the MEDIA HAS? Like accusing a reporter of being a criminal and treating them as such.

You don't think giving AMNESTY to 5 Million illegals is anti-business? While they won't ENFORCE eVerify requirement and force HONEST BUSINESSES to compete with cheap unskilled labor flooding the borders not to mention SCHOOLS???

3) You obviously never even HEARD Of OPERATION CHOKE POINT.

The Center for Regulatory Solutions » Fact of the Day: Time to End Obama Administration

Meet Four Business Owners Squeezed by Operation Choke Point

Feds Blame

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-bl...on-choke-point

It doesn't MATTER what "legislation" Obama signed. We know WHAT he is. And HOW he avoiding even HAVING to sign or veto legislation. And what his ACTIONS prove. And the people SPOKE last week. They're OVER IT. Liberalism and Progressive-ism is a failure HERE just like everywhere else. It is no longer an academic CONCEPT but reality.

Last edited by runswithscissors; 11-13-2014 at 04:05 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,908,308 times
Reputation: 14125
You know why Dodd-Frank was passed by both houses and signed by President Obama? The backlash of the bailouts that we needed to allow for after several banks needed to be bailed out because they were "too big to fail" because they took on too many bad debt with the securities bubble over the early and mid 2000's and they would have brought us into a TRUE depression if we didn't bail them out. I know, fear that, we couldn't do laizee-fare economics. It's like complaining about Sarbanes-Oaxley but we wouldn't need that if companies operated in a ethical manner.

The EPA is a "needed evil." Would you want to not be able to jump into your local lake, river, stream, ocean, etc. because it is dirty from a company? You can't really swim on the north shore of Long Island, NY along the coast of the Long Island Sound, but at least you have the south shore along the Atlantic coast. Would you want to experience what it is like to live in China and wear surgical masks to walk around town? Arizona has that with limited pollution from what is called "brown cloud" which isn't really pollution parsay it is more dirt getting kicked up into the air from farming and off-roading. Wouldn't you want few more generations enjoy what you enjoyed even if it's at a little bit of a cost to businesses?

I've heard of choke points and Obamacare is one and to an extent the EPA is though as I said the EPA is and unless we go to a more single-payer system rather than Obamacare, Obamacare will continue to be a choke point. I still fail to see besides Obamacare (something that I've recently become more in favor for than against) and the EPA what Obama has done that is ant-business and I didn't think he was the best choice for President either time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,832,599 times
Reputation: 7801
The economy improves...in spite of the Marxists in power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 10:52 AM
 
Location: NoVa
803 posts, read 1,668,525 times
Reputation: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
You are mistaken. Obama's entire political philosophy is anti-business. Nothing he has done is pro-business.

How do you conservatives say this with a straight face, when U.S. businesses are sitting on several trillion worth of cash/assets, and market indices are at all-time highs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,908,308 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASOT View Post
How do you conservatives say this with a straight face, when U.S. businesses are sitting on several trillion worth of cash/assets, and market indices are at all-time highs?
And also the fact that if Obama was truly as anti-business as people think he is, he wouldn't have made it that far in the primaries. This happens with all the PACs during the state primaries. I honestly think that conservatives think anything that causes spending or even thinks that EPA regulation is needed is a Marxist or Commie even if they are a moderate (not saying Obama is.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,231,819 times
Reputation: 5824
Quote:
Originally Posted by jma501 View Post
Think its bad now? Wait till the republicans take over in January and implement all their pro big business plans.

Yeah, those terrible republicans will probably only lower corporate taxes and create long lasting jobs with higher wages and yields, huh? Unlike YOUR guy who spent billions on "shovel ready" projects that didn't materialize and created an entire underground economy of underemployed......The Republicans will do this WITHOUT your spending and finally create some real jobs where the first question out of the employees mouth won't be; "would you like fries with that"?

Those evil Republicans........boy, you really got them pegged....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 11:43 AM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,903,157 times
Reputation: 17353
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
And also the fact that if Obama was truly as anti-business as people think he is, he wouldn't have made it that far in the primaries.

"Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever."

If Obama was truly as moderate as people thought he was, he wouldn't have made it 20 years sitting in this church with his MENTOR.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEMZHQsQJ6Y
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2014, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,908,308 times
Reputation: 14125
I will not defend Rev. Wright, that takes steps back just as Stokley Carmichael did during the civil rights movement. However what church you belong to don't dictate that you believe that way. If that were the case I'd believe abortion should be illegal like the Catholic Church that I grew up going to, does. I am not sure if Obama believes the Wright preaching or not. Nor would it mean he couldn't be a moderate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2014, 02:51 PM
 
760 posts, read 769,144 times
Reputation: 1452
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
The cliché is getting very tiresome. Republicans have done more to lift people out of poverty than the Democrats, with all their rhetoric, have ever done
Guess you forgot who was in charge during the CRASH of 1929,

American national politics during the 1920s were dominated by the Republican Party, which controlled the White House and Congress throughout the decade. Presidents Warren Harding (in office 1921-23) and Calvin Coolidge (1923-29) were very conservative men who believed strongly in laissez-faire and in the primary role of business in American life. In 1928, another Republican, Herbert Hoover, was elected president in a landslide over Democrat Al Smith.

He had also been Secretary of Commerce under Harding and Coolidge, so he in particular was given a great deal of credit for the decade’s seeming prosperity. Hoover confidently took office in March 1929, and in his inaugural address he proclaimed that "I have no fears for the future of our country. It is bright with hope." Seven months later, the stock market crashed and the worst depression in American history began. It would last for over ten years.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top