New scientific paper links climate to sun, not carbon (Al Gore, education, state)

[Mathguy]

Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun

I read the article. At the bottom it links to a right-wing denialist site call "hockeyshtick". This is not science. There's no science here.

I'm sure that if the denialists ever post something of actual scientific merit, it will show up in the scientific publications. This is why they never, ever post anything from scientific publications; their claims have no scientific merit.

Better luck next time, denialists.

Meanwhile, in another thread the OP is railing about round-up herbicide poisoning the soil so that nothing will grow in it for ages and ages. Sources? Obscure eco dot-orgs and motherjones. lol

Legitimate sourcing and actual science....why not ask for a unicorn and pot of gold instead....that's more likely to come your way.

[thecoalman]

Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun

I read the article. At the bottom it links to a right-wing denialist site call "hockeyshtick". This is not science. There's no science here.

I'm sure that if the denialists ever post something of actual scientific merit, it will show up in the scientific publications. This is why they never, ever post anything from scientific publications; their claims have no scientific merit.

Better luck next time, denialists.

ROFL, because a site mentions the study you're going to discount the study?

Here is the study.


Correlation between solar activity and the local temperature of Antarctica during the past 11,000 years

[Kreutz]

96% of the solar systems mass can affect the Earth? You don't say.

[OICU812]

Originally Posted by Ed from California

Yes but one can't tax the sun.

Surely the statists can find the right angle to make even that happen.

[PuddingPops]

So how can white, self loathing liberals protest the sun? If we spread enough awareness, can Obama and other world leaders turn it down some how? Maybe Leonardo DiCaprio can help from his private yacht.

[legalsea]

"Since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun. I shall do the next best thing: block it out."

Montgomery Burns

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by jimhcom

New paper finds strong evidence the Sun has controlled climate over the past 11,000 years, not CO2 | Principia Scientific Intl

As rational people have been saying for some time, climate change is dictated by changes in the sun and not in CO2.

Just another unconfirmed variable.

A case where a given is a variable.

The sun has moods.

[PedroMartinez]

Originally Posted by PuddingPops

So how can white, self loathing liberals protest the sun? If we spread enough awareness, can Obama and other world leaders turn it down some how? Maybe Leonardo DiCaprio can help from his private yacht.

The DC crowd will eventually tell them what to think and say in order to continue the money flowing to DC so they can line their pockets even more.

For the DC crowd, anything they can use to collect tax dollars and power is their scientific religion.

[Seabass Inna Bun]

Originally Posted by thecoalman

ROFL, because a site mentions the study you're going to discount the study?

If it's real, I'll read about it in real literature on the matter. And there's no doubt that the denialist website will claim the study proves something it doesn't, otherwise the denialist website wouldn't bother. Reading denialist websites is a waste of time.

[thecoalman]

Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun

If it's real,.....

Way didn't you take the time to find out before flapping your lips?

It's real, see the link.