Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2014, 11:24 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
My ilk ? which ilk would that be? I am a Libertarian / Conservative . Elizabeth Warren is a far left Democrat. The premise of this thread is just plain goofy. You guys can clamor all you want about how bad things are but you are not willing to accept the reality of how to fix it. You are either disingenuous or politically bi polar. Most people are not one issue voters and they understand you are never going to get 100%.

It does not matter to me what party you belong to.

I am taking the assumption based on the people attacking her that they are doing so because she is going after Wall Street Corruption.

Now prove me wrong by saying "Wall Street needs to be reined in, but we need to pick such and such instead because she is lying."


Any less obviously tells the tale where they actually support the collusion.

Do you Support People, Corporations and Banks standing on their Own Two Feet or Not is what it comes down to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-26-2014, 11:35 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 10,822,703 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
It does not matter to me what party you belong to.

I am taking the assumption based on the people attacking her that they are doing so because she is going after Wall Street Corruption.

Now prove me wrong by saying "Wall Street needs to be reined in, but we need to pick such and such instead because she is lying."


Any less obviously tells the tale where they actually support the collusion.

Do you Support People, Corporations and Banks standing on their Own Two Feet or Not is what it comes down to.
You are very naïve if you don't think that Warren is in the democrat party for a reason.

Bad assumption, like I said. I oppose her because she is a left wing democrat that is as full of sh*t as Obama proved to be. If you want to believe her campaign rhetoric that's your business, but she is no more going to "reign in" wall street than Obama was going to end all wars. When it comes to priorities , wall street is not at the top of my list and as I said I am not a 1 issue voter.
The op asked why Conservatives don't support Warren? The answer; She is a left wing ideologue, why would they? Conservatives are on the right, just for clarification.

Last edited by silas777; 12-26-2014 at 11:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2014, 11:49 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
You are very naïve if you don't think that Warren is in the democrat party for a reason.

Bad assumption, like I said. I oppose her because she is a left wing democrat that is as full of sh*t as Obama proved to be. If you want to believe her campaign rhetoric that's your business, but she is no more going to "reign in" wall street than Obama was going to end all wars. When it comes to priorities , wall street is not at the top of my list and as I said I am not a 1 issue voter.

So what you are basically saying is that your vote is based more on party than policies?

It does not matter to me if you are the Koch Brothers or George Soros if you have policies I agree with.


We hear so much these days about standing on your own two feet and at the same time hand over billions of dollars to the Bankers, Military Industrial Complex and Corporate Subsidies and Tax Breaks that it is pretty hard to take either party seriously.

Neither Party has anything to offer to the average American

All they have to offer is to their special interest donors and to help raise their stock dividends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2014, 11:58 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 10,822,703 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
So what you are basically saying is that your vote is based more on party than policies?

It does not matter to me if you are the Koch Brothers or George Soros if you have policies I agree with.


We hear so much these days about standing on your own two feet and at the same time hand over billions of dollars to the Bankers, Military Industrial Complex and Corporate Subsidies and Tax Breaks that it is pretty hard to take either party seriously.

Neither Party has anything to offer to the average American

All they have to offer is to their special interest donors and to help raise their stock dividends.
Policies determine the party, if higher taxes, homosexual rights, global warming, feminist rights are a priority then vote democrat. If national defense, Military, lower taxes, property rights, 2nd amendment, and free market are your priorities vote Republican.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2014, 12:00 AM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewww View Post
Republicans have been told that speaking against corporate monopolies is akin to socialism.

Just like they have been told that speaking out against Israel controlling US foreign policy is akin to supporting Islam.

They aren't a bright lot, OP.
Socialism is for the people where cost controls come into play.

What we have is corporate fascism where we are forced to prop up Corporations via the Barrel of the Gun all done by the wealthy elite. Obama Care is very far from socialism where we are forced to prop up private for profit insurance where CEO and Shareholders rather than citizens are the top concern. They want Americans to prop up their lucrative costs.

Labor Power has been dying (unions on decline)
Protester Freedoms have been dying ( Freedom Zones)
Lobbying Freedoms have increased

Basically Economic Freedoms are slowly opening for the Profit Class and Freedoms for everyone else has been diminishing.


It was not Joe Six Pack or the Common Protester that brought us to where we are today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2014, 12:14 AM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
Policies determine the party, if higher taxes, homosexual rights, global warming, feminist rights are a priority then vote democrat. If national defense, Military, lower taxes, property rights, 2nd amendment, and free market are your priorities vote Republican.
So basically both parties are Bi-Partisan when it comes to Corporate and Banking Corruption that has a major impact in the markets on the people in this country is what it comes down to.

There is no "Market Prices" when Corporate and Banking Lobbyists control policy

When people speak of Market Wages and Prices in this country as if they are determined via free and fair competition, they need to be laughed at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2014, 04:05 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
It does not matter to me what party you belong to.

I am taking the assumption based on the people attacking her that they are doing so because she is going after Wall Street Corruption.
So far it's been mostly just saying she will. Yep, she voted against the bloat and give aways in the trillion dollar budget unlike most (R)'s and I give her credit for that but so did many others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2014, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Baja Virginia
2,798 posts, read 2,990,388 times
Reputation: 3985
"I have to laugh when people talk about someone like Elizabeth Warren as a far left radical, the progressive version of Ted Cruz or Jim DeMint. Cruz and DeMint want to shut down government at the drop of a hat, deport all undocumented immigrants, and abolish the minimum wage, and generally support a whole series of profoundly unpopular agenda items. As for Warren, I have heard or read a great many of her speeches, as well as her terrific autobiography, and I can't ever remember her advocating for something that was unpopular with the American people. Her economic policy prescriptions generally garner 70-80% when polled. Prosecuting the bankers who brought down the economy with their reckless and illegal bank fraud? Check. Breaking up the biggest banks? Check. Strong oversight of the big banks provided by agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Check. Expanding Social Security benefits? Check. Raising the minimum wage? Reforming the student loan system and reducing student debt? Check. Making a big investment in roads and bridges and education? Check. All of those policies are strongly supported by the American people. Rather than being an extremist, Elizabeth Warren is right in line with most Americans on what she is advocating, certainly far more than beltway pundits bloviating about what responsible centrism is or is not, and certainly more so that conservatives who want to do the opposite of all the popular policies cited above."

Pulling the Princes From Their Thrones*|*Mike Lux
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2014, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,726,020 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by silas777 View Post
My ilk ? which ilk would that be? I am a Libertarian / Conservative . Elizabeth Warren is a far left Democrat. The premise of this thread is just plain goofy. You guys can clamor all you want about how bad things are but you are not willing to accept the reality of how to fix it. You are either disingenuous or politically bi polar. Most people are not one issue voters and they understand you are never going to get 100%.
agree completely. I too, am a conservative/Libertarian or with Libertarian views on things. Other than, maybe be somewhat of an isolationist and I not really that, how could any one like us support her? What are some people even thinking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2014, 01:51 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by scratchie View Post
"I have to laugh when people talk about someone like Elizabeth Warren as a far left radical, the progressive version of Ted Cruz or Jim DeMint. Cruz and DeMint want to shut down government at the drop of a hat, deport all undocumented immigrants, and abolish the minimum wage, and generally support a whole series of profoundly unpopular agenda items. As for Warren, I have heard or read a great many of her speeches, as well as her terrific autobiography, and I can't ever remember her advocating for something that was unpopular with the American people. Her economic policy prescriptions generally garner 70-80% when polled. Prosecuting the bankers who brought down the economy with their reckless and illegal bank fraud? Check. Breaking up the biggest banks? Check. Strong oversight of the big banks provided by agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Check. Expanding Social Security benefits? Check. Raising the minimum wage? Reforming the student loan system and reducing student debt? Check. Making a big investment in roads and bridges and education? Check. All of those policies are strongly supported by the American people. Rather than being an extremist, Elizabeth Warren is right in line with most Americans on what she is advocating, certainly far more than beltway pundits bloviating about what responsible centrism is or is not, and certainly more so that conservatives who want to do the opposite of all the popular policies cited above."

Pulling the Princes From Their Thrones*|*Mike Lux
Obama said he was for all of that. It's easy to claim to be for something. Why should people really think she is different?

I would like to be able to support her but she started off poorly. I do have a problem with the "you didn't build that" statements. I do have a problem with someone making $350,000 to teach a class complaining about the cost of an education.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top