Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I fully support Sen Warren's speech on the Senate floor and am disgusted that Citigroup/Chase have so much influence in the spending bill/legislation. I'm going to make good on withdrawing my Chase savings account (which draws no interest) and put it into a local credit union $9,999 at a time. If conservatives support limited government, then why not support her?
we dont support warren for the same reason we dont stand in front of monkeys that poop in their hands and throw the nasty at the people standing in front of them.
No, but a Bush is never for small government either!! George W was hardly a thrifty soul. Voting among the two parties is always a struggle to find the lesser evil.
What we have is a 2 party system... I was very disappointed in Bush but at the end of the day who is going to nominate and confirm judges closer to your values as a libertarian to the SCOTUS. Democarts or Republicans.
Neither Bush nor the Republican party are for "small" government.
What ever gave you that idea ?
The Libertarian party is for smaller government and neither Warren nor Bush are Libertarians.
You seem to be confusing Libertarian platform issues with Republican platform issues.
No I live in reality. Libertarians don't win and never will win the Whitehouse , you have a choice between the democrat party or republican party. I choose to take as much as I can get vs the opposite of what I really want. See Ross Perot and Ralph Nader.
I fully support Sen Warren's speech on the Senate floor and am disgusted that Citigroup/Chase have so much influence in the spending bill/legislation. I'm going to make good on withdrawing my Chase savings account (which draws no interest) and put it into a local credit union $9,999 at a time. If conservatives support limited government, then why not support her?
The woman is the poster girl for mental illness and will manipulate low intellect voters just like Osama did.
That is VERY common in the American South. Tons of VERY white people claim their old Cherokee great-grandmother. Every once in a while, you might run into one who bears Native American traits. If she used it for political purposes, that's probably not a good thing.
She didn't. She just checked a box in college because she was *told by her family* she was part Native American. She just can't trace it back with legal documents. It has not ever been disproved but it's an easy was for conservatives to brand her a liar.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehotex
I fully support Sen Warren's speech on the Senate floor and am disgusted that Citigroup/Chase have so much influence in the spending bill/legislation. I'm going to make good on withdrawing my Chase savings account (which draws no interest) and put it into a local credit union $9,999 at a time. If conservatives support limited government, then why not support her?
Because conservative support of limited government is mostly lip service. Their idolization of people like Reagan show they are perfectly willing to support the growth of government when it suits their agenda.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
See Ross Perot and Ralph Nader.
