Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2015, 07:12 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 20,011,541 times
Reputation: 7315

Advertisements

Land mass w/o people, uggabugga. That makes it as valuable as a deserted island.

News flash: Electoral votes depend on population, not square miles. Montana has 3, just as all of our least populated states do. That is just .6%, or 3/538th of the US total. I'm sure both parties will spend weeks fighting over those 3 (NOT)!

PS,Population and electoral votes-They covered that in geography, too (LOL).

 
Old 02-14-2015, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 11,013,877 times
Reputation: 14180
By the way, at last report the bill has been tabled and will not be voted on.
Yes, even Montana has wierdos. It doesn't take a large population to have them.
The only advantage that large population centers have is that there are numerically MORE of them! I do believe the percentage stays the same.

By the way, as always it might pay to read the entire bill to see just what the guy was trying to accomplish. the yoga pants were just a small part of it.
I think he should have included pajamas!
 
Old 02-14-2015, 09:38 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,954 posts, read 34,795,868 times
Reputation: 29411
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Land mass w/o people, uggabugga. That makes it as valuable as a deserted island.

News flash: Electoral votes depend on population, not square miles. Montana has 3, just as all of our least populated states do. That is just .6%, or 3/538th of the US total. I'm sure both parties will spend weeks fighting over those 3 (NOT)!

PS,Population and electoral votes-They covered that in geography, too (LOL).
News flash: low population doesn't magically decrease the physical size of a state
 
Old 02-14-2015, 10:03 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 20,011,541 times
Reputation: 7315
Low population = no political clout, an insignificant state. The good news is there would not be much local media to embarrass this clown politician from Montana.
 
Old 02-14-2015, 11:58 PM
 
Location: Poshawa, Ontario
2,982 posts, read 4,112,591 times
Reputation: 5622
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
WTF, isn't there more important things that these A_$$hats should be spending their time on ?!
If they worried about things that actually matter, America wouldn't have half the problems it is currently suffering with.

Instead of a ban on yoga pants and speedos, why not a ban on politicians with a sub-par IQ?
 
Old 02-15-2015, 12:06 AM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 20,011,541 times
Reputation: 7315
Agreed, Annuvin.
 
Old 02-16-2015, 09:47 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 12,020,129 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
Montana is a 'small state'?

I guess they don't teach geography any more

Area wise? No. Population wise? Yes. 4th in size, and 44th in population.
 
Old 02-16-2015, 09:51 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 12,020,129 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
I have seen very few women in yoga pants or men in speedos who looked good in them.

It could be where you live. I've seen more women that looked good in them than looked bad. As for men in speedos, well... for obvious reasons it just doesn't do it for me.
 
Old 02-17-2015, 01:43 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,386,802 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Seriously? He's the only president who backed and signed a law that requires everyone to buy a private sector product: health insurance. That's DEFINITELY an attack on freedom.
Every state but 2 requires that drivers have auto insurance.
Somehow all those states have survived their loss of "freedom".
Get real.


Ken
 
Old 02-17-2015, 02:05 AM
 
Location: Iowa, Heartland of Murica
3,425 posts, read 6,320,687 times
Reputation: 3446
Both Speedos and yoga pants are fashions of the Socialists in Europe. They have been promoting the feminization of men for years and the plan is to transform an entire generation of men into submissive pansies.

The ultimate plan is to destroy the family structure and create a new system of "alternative" lifestyles and relationships like gay marriage
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top