Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Undecided voters are sitting back in awe right now of how die hard Democrats are ignoring this entire situation. People who are honestly trying to decide who to vote for won't support someone who openly destroyed evidence that was under subpoena for an investigation.
There is no excuse for what took place, it's crooked as hell and the left wing Hillary supporters we have here on CD know it, you guys would love for this to all just go away. It's not going away, people are paying attention to this and it will rightfully come up during the election.
Clinton tells House panel she has deleted all emails from server
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Its posters like you which cause me to lose respect for Democrats.
Wrong is wrong, illegal is illegal, and such. When you start to defend wrongful actions, you lose far more credibility than those who conducted the act.
Indeed.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career. Why? “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
I don't think that's the case. Even Democrats wouldn't nominate someone that corrupt, incompetent and with such a record of failure and lying to the American people. Even most Dems care a little bit about integrity.
But it isn't most dems who will vote to give her the nomination, it's a small subset of decision makers who probably don't care about integrity or at least not nearly as much as they do about power and winning.
And if she does get the nomination do you really think that most dems won't vote for her anyway? There have been dems here who have stated outright that they'd vote for a crooked democrat over an honest republican, I'm sure most of them feel the same way.
The email server keeps a log of the recipients, and the ISP also keeps a log.
If you are telling me that Clinton deleted:
1. All emails
2. All server logs
3. All backups
4. All archives
This would be deliberate act to conceal or destroy records.
Why do you think she took the extraordinary step to set up her own private email server, register her own domain and house that server in a location that she controlled all outside of the reach of government investigators?
Why do you think she physically printed the thousands of emails that she did turn over? Because you can't track data, ISPs, IP addresses or even validity on a piece of paper.
There is ZERO explanation of why this was done other than corruption and crooked politics.
Why do you think she took the extraordinary step to set up her own private email server, register her own domain and house that server in a location that she controlled all outside of the reach of government investigators?
Why do you think she physically printed the thousands of emails that she did turn over? Because you can't track data, ISPs, IP addresses or even validity on a piece of paper.
There is ZERO explanation of why this was done other than corruption and crooked politics.
Well it is her server and she said she gave all the important emails over to the State Dept.
She did one better than Lois though
You can bet that Hillary has the best of the best working for her to make sure whatever was on that server is now permanently gone and destroyed. At least the Clintons didn't have to kill anyone this time around... not yet at least.
Approval from who to do what? Approval to break just about every rule on the books? Approval to create what appears to be the most crooked situation ever? Approval to destroy thousands of emails that were under subpena during an investigation with little more than a "trust me" in reply?
Approval from who to do what? Approval to break just about every rule on the books? Approval to create what appears to be the most crooked situation ever? Approval to destroy thousands of emails that were under subpena during an investigation with little more than a "trust me" in reply?
Approval and orders to set it up that way in the first place.
Don't be so naive.
To operate that criminally, and get away with it, you need power.
She got da juice.
Law is one of the lowest forms of power.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Clinton tells House panel she has deleted all emails from server
Approval to break just about every rule on the books? Approval to create what appears to be the most crooked situation ever? Approval to destroy thousands of emails that were under subpena during an investigation with little more than a "trust me" in reply? 
