Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The various EU countries should put them on a plane for various Muslim nations around the world.
That is totally unrealistic. Not only would it take lots of planes, there would also be legal issues. One can't send Syrians back to a country where there is a civil war. And why would any other Muslim countries accept them? Just because a country is Muslim, does not mean it feels any more obliged to help Muslim refugees than a European country does. SA, Iran etc. want Syrian refugees as little as France or Greece does.
That whole Muslim brotherhood thingy is just empty talk, it only serves when bragging about the percentage of Islam in the world, but Muslim people as such care as little or even less about each other than people in the West do. There is no Muslim loyalty or whatever. Why does none of those filthy rich Arab countries help the Palestinians in Gaza etc.? There is also a lot of racism and tribalism among Muslims, Arab Muslims look down on black African Muslims for instance.
He demonstrates that moderate Muslims support stoning women and executing gays.
Then he asks if Western politicians should call such moderates "extremists."
His answer is "no."
And I agree.
They're not Muslim extremists.
All they are is Muslim.
And all Muslims should be expelled.
I've been saying that for a long time.
That is why I said earlier that US Americans don't know how lucky they are that their illegals are fellow Americans from Latin America, i.e. overwhelmingly Christians and atheists/agnostics from Latin America...
Despite the different language and food, they have similar values, whereas there is something inherently incompatible about Islam.
That is totally unrealistic. Not only would it take lots of planes, there would also be legal issues. One can't send Syrians back to a country where there is a civil war. And why would any other Muslim countries accept them? Just because a country is Muslim, does not mean it feels any more obliged to help Muslim refugees than a European country does. SA, Iran etc. want Syrian refugees as little as France or Greece does.
That whole Muslim brotherhood thingy is just empty talk, it only serves when bragging about the percentage of Islam in the world, but Muslim people as such care as little or even less about each other than people in the West do. There is no Muslim loyalty or whatever. Why does none of those filthy rich Arab countries help the Palestinians in Gaza etc.? There is also a lot of racism and tribalism among Muslims, Arab Muslims look down on black African Muslims for instance.
Not our problem.
Land the plane, shove them out, then leave.
If the countries try to shoot at the plane, clear the area with daisy cutters/cluster bombs/napalm.
That is why I said earlier that US Americans don't know how lucky they are that their illegals are fellow Americans from Latin America, i.e. overwhelmingly Christians and atheists/agnostics from Latin America...
Despite the different language and food, they have similar values, whereas there is something inherently incompatible about Islam.
I agree with you there.
But we need to deport all the illegals from Latin America as well.
Especially in Europe they can't do it for legal reasons, UN conventions etc. Refugees enjoy a special status, which has to be determined first, which takes time...
Not even in the US do they do it that way, although the US receives just a small fraction of the world's refugees, i.e. most illegals there are not refugees, but simply economic migrants looking for a better life.
Well, as far as I know there are sanctions in place.
And in the case of Russia things are not even clear, but quite messy with accusations, but little to no evidence.
Now, if say France did what you suggest, it would break conventions and everyone would know it.
Especially in Europe they can't do it for legal reasons, UN conventions etc. Refugees enjoy a special status, which has to be determined first, which takes time...
Not even in the US do they do it that way, although the US receives just a small fraction of the world's refugees, i.e. most illegals there are not refugees, but simply economic migrants looking for a better life.
Crazy times we are living in. This could usher in another dark age for Europe.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
