Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Huh, Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton are non Presidents on paper currency. So the precedence of putting non presidents on paper money already established.
And Salmon P. Chase is on the $10,000 bill. Heck, in the early days of U.S. paper money, lots of people appeared on the bills who weren't presidents, from Cabinet members to war heroes to Indian chiefs. Samuel F.B. Morse, the inventor of the telegraph, was on one bill. Even Martha Washington once made an appearance. The current crop of faces didn't become standardized until the 1920s.
Before Lincoln in 1909, the U.S. never put actual people on coins, either. It was usually either an Indian chief or Lady Liberty.
Huh, Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton are non Presidents on paper currency. So the precedence of putting non presidents on paper money already established.
They are founding fathers. Plus Hamilton was killed in a duel with Aaron Burr.
They are founding fathers. Plus Hamilton was killed in a duel with Aaron Burr.
So? They are still non presidents.
Basically the requirement that people on our money be a former president or a founding father guarantees on,y white men on paper currency.
What sense does that make?
I mean are people so ignorant or hateful that the simple act recognizing that Americans who aren't white men are great Americans who against all odds made this nation better and they too deserve to be honored by being put on paper currency, upsets them?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.