Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2015, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,761,514 times
Reputation: 10006

Advertisements

For the first time, the DOJ has published numbers for Hispanic perpetrators of violent crime instead of just for Hispanic victims.




Quote:
...when whites commit violence they choose fellow whites as victims 82.4
percent of the time, and almost never attack blacks. Blacks attack whites almost
as often as they attack blacks, and Hispanics attack whites more often
than they attack any other group, including their own.

There is much media agonizing over black-on-black violence, but these figures
show that only 40.1 percent of the victims of black violence are black, while
people of other races account for nearly 60 percent of the victims of black
violence.
New DOJ Statistics on Race and Violent Crime | American Renaissance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2015, 07:44 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,656,546 times
Reputation: 13053
Interesting.
A lot of factors to consider before one could make a reasonable conclusion or come up with any solution to effect those statistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 07:59 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556
Well it clearly shows that whites are less likely to be violent offenders than are blacks and Hispanics, but more likely to be victims. Did anyone suspect otherwise? Is that considered "white privilege" to be privileged with more interracial violent crime? Isn't diversity great?

Up till this years report, The FBI statistics use to fold Hispanic offenders under white to increase the white offender rate. People would often claim that Hispanics didn't offend at a higher rate than whites, but when the statistics for Hispanic offenders began to be reported separately it shows they do offend at a higher rate.

Last edited by mtl1; 07-02-2015 at 08:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 08:04 PM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,090,374 times
Reputation: 5927
With so much unsolved crime, how are the unknowns below 10%? We're not that good at solving crime. Lots of variables in this report.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 08:10 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,656,546 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Well it clearly shows that whites are less likely to be violent offenders than are blacks and Hispanics, but more likely to be victims. Did anyone suspect otherwise? Is that considered "white privilege" to be privileged with more interracial violent crime? Isn't diversity great?

Up till this years report, The FBI statistics use to fold Hispanic offenders under white to increase the white offender rate. People would often claim that Hispanics didn't offend at a higher rate than whites, but when the statistics for Hispanic offenders began to be reported separately it shows they do offend at a higher rate.
You make a good point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,761,514 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk View Post
With so much unsolved crime, how are the unknowns below 10%? We're not that good at solving crime. Lots of variables in this report.
Unless the victim is dead, he or she would generally be able to report the race of the offender.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 08:47 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,906,907 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
Well it clearly shows that whites are less likely to be violent offenders than are blacks and Hispanics, but more likely to be victims. Did anyone suspect otherwise? Is that considered "white privilege" to be privileged with more interracial violent crime? Isn't diversity great?

Up till this years report, The FBI statistics use to fold Hispanic offenders under white to increase the white offender rate. People would often claim that Hispanics didn't offend at a higher rate than whites, but when the statistics for Hispanic offenders began to be reported separately it shows they do offend at a higher rate.
To be fair: how do the feds figure out if a person's "Hispanic" or not? Spanish last names ain't fool proof and many Latinos have "anglo" or even Chinese names.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 08:51 PM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,090,374 times
Reputation: 5927
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Unless the victim is dead, he or she would generally be able to report the race of the offender.
Not with the categories mentioned. Alaskan natives, American Indians, Hispanic but not part Caucasian or African American. No way that over 90% of victims are 100% right all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,761,514 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk View Post
Not with the categories mentioned. Alaskan natives, American Indians, Hispanic but not part Caucasian or African American. No way that over 90% of victims are 100% right all the time.
Alaskan natives and American Indins are lumped into the same "other" category as mixed race people anyway. As for Hispanics, I agree that it would be impossible to know for sure unless the perp is found or was already known to the victim. Some people are likely mislabled as Hispanic, or not Hispanic, in the data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 10:31 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
To be fair: how do the feds figure out if a person's "Hispanic" or not? Spanish last names ain't fool proof and many Latinos have "anglo" or even Chinese names.
Well it's probably safe to assume when in doubt Hispanic offenders tend to get folded into as white. That's what the feds had been doing. Additionally many Hispanics claim white and probably fewer pure Europeans from south of the border would be offenders and claim Hispanic. If you seen wanted posters or booking photos, it's generally very easy to identify them as Hispanic even though the government usually list the race as white.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top