Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
like you being pro life after 8 weeks? it's only a "real" life then?
I gave detailed reasoning behind that position. It is clear and concise. If you lack the ability to understand it, I can try to dumb it down. Is that what you're requesting.
But you have not explained your reasoning.
1) woman's choice above unborn life
2) abortion should be illegal once viable
3) a baby is not truly alive until birth
Those do not logically mesh.
I'm sure you are well aware of that by now. Or do you not see the contradiction?
I gave detailed reasoning behind that position. It is clear and concise. If you lack the ability to understand it, I can try to dumb it down. Is that what you're requesting.
But you have not explained your reasoning.
1) woman's choice above unborn life
2) abortion should be illegal once viable
3) a baby is not truly alive until birth
Those do not logically mesh.
I'm sure you are well aware of that by now. Or do you not see the contradiction?
you may have been clear and concise however that doesn't mean it makes logical sense to others. just as you don't see mu logic.
your list. I can agree with your assessment. you seem to have the first two correct or close enough.
the third we differ on the definition of "life" I see it as before viability and dependent on a womb and not able to live outside the womb as a defining line. you do not. very simple.
Ah, I get it. You don't get it. Not wanting my tax dollars to be allocated to an agency that kills babies is not an opinion.
But your statement implying that serial aborters are a significant problem is, indeed, an opinion - not a fact - and that is the post to which I was replying.
97% of PP's activities have nothing to do with abortion. In a number of states, PP has no facilities that perform abortions. But, hey, don't let the facts get in the way of your "opinion."
So should tax dollars be allocated to an agency that forces childbirth upon women?
it will need lots of tax dollars to keep up with all the mandatory pregnancy testing they will have to do on women between the ages of 10 and 45. how often should they test? every 10 days or so to be on the safe side.
how much to keep the women who are pregnant that want to abort on lock down?
it will need lots of tax dollars to keep up with all the mandatory pregnancy testing they will have to do on women between the ages of 10 and 45. how often should they test? every 10 days or so to be on the safe side.
how much to keep the women who are pregnant that want to abort on lock down?
Also how will they determine accidental from intentional miscarriages? Sounds like fertile ground for lots of witch trials.
Also how will they determine accidental from intentional miscarriages? Sounds like fertile ground for lots of witch trials.
do you think pro life ladies will volunteer to incubate all the unused in vitro eggs left in the clinics?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
every 10 days or so to be on the safe side. 