Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the drug war is unconstitutional no mater how you parse it.
So in your mind () Domestic tranquility= Banning plants, cavity searches, no knock warrants, prison, fines, seizure of assets, militarization of police depts....
You are full of it.
Yeah, shaking down citizens for what they choose to put in their bodies is really insuring domestic tranquility. Good to see that others like yourself get it in regards to the drug war being un-Constitutional and more people are starting to get it as well.
the drug war is unconstitutional no matter how you parse it.
So in your mind ()
Domestic tranquility= Banning plants, cavity searches, no knock warrants, prison, fines, seizure of assets, militarization of police depts....
You are full of it.
Boy, did you nail that one!
And it makes perfect sense to me, because I am absolutely convinced that Finn is somehow connected with law enforcement.
Funny. The "law" (The Marijuana Tax Stamp Act of 1937) against pot plants to "insure domestic tranquility" has had EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE EFFECT. Just like the prohibition of alcohol had the opposite effect than intended, and promoted crime.
Nope Finn! You can't go through the amendment process for prohibiting one substance like alcohol, and then turnaround and not do the same for others! Can't have it both ways! Maybe prohibitionist and authoritarian types who seek to intrude on people's individual liberties are OK with going around the amendment process, but those who support individual liberties are not. Too many people have been hoodwinked and too many lives ruined due to prohibition.
Of course you can. Does the Constitution ban nuclear materials? No, and why should it.
Quote:
Why are you interested in continuing policies that destroy people's lives and harm more innocents than the actual substance itself?
You are the one who voted against legalization.
Why are you interested in continuing policies that destroy people's lives and harm more innocents?
However, the prevalence of marijuana use disorder among marijuana users decreased significantly from 2001-2002 (35.6%; SE, 1.37) to 2012-2013 (30.6%; SE, 1.04).
Yes, and if you bother reading the OP, or thinking about it you would know this:
Quote:
And then they celebrate by saying ""The prevalence of marijuana use disorder among marijuana users decreased significantly from 2001-2013," from 35.6 percent of users to 30.6."
Lets get this straight: 10 years ago you had 1000 users, 350 of then had marijuana related disorders, and today you have 2000 users and 600 people with disorders, and that's somehow a good thing? Number of people with disorders nearly doubled.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)
