Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-09-2019, 06:02 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,554,711 times
Reputation: 24780

Advertisements

Well, well, well...

tRump's "approval" has now risen to 40%.

But his disapproval has sunk to only 55%.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...roval-ratings/

So much win!

MAG, DTS and all that.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-09-2019, 07:17 AM
 
1,991 posts, read 901,434 times
Reputation: 2627
After Trump’s low information voters figure out they were conned by Trump’s tax cut for the 1%, I predict Trump’s approval ratings will be in the upper twenties. Let’s give it a month and see. #Wheresmyrefund. #Ineverowedbefore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,193 posts, read 19,473,387 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roscoe Conkling View Post
Nope,I was referring to a poll published this week

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports®

Only one of us looks foolish at this moment.

Lol nice cover. You bumped a thread from 3 years ago when you did it, did not link to the poll at the time and at the time you bumped the thread the Rasmussen poll, he wasn't even at 50%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,912,657 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
I thought polls were rigged and fake news? Are we believing polls again, now that one of them says something good about the President?
They are when they don't support a position they want. They don't talk about how Rausserman said Romney would beat Obama in the popular vote either...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 10:37 AM
 
5,606 posts, read 3,514,310 times
Reputation: 7414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Lol nice cover. You bumped a thread from 3 years ago when you did it, did not link to the poll at the time and at the time you bumped the thread the Rasmussen poll, he wasn't even at 50%.
Have a look at the thread title.
The word "merged" gives the game away.
Seriously,you're making yourself look like the village idiot.
Stop digging.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,193 posts, read 19,473,387 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roscoe Conkling View Post
Have a look at the thread title.
The word "merged" gives the game away.
Seriously,you're making yourself look like the village idiot.
Stop digging.

Your post that I responded to initially was in another thread in which was a Primary poll thread you bumped from March 2016. It was since merged into the main poll thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 10:42 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,583 posts, read 17,304,861 times
Reputation: 37355
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
They are when they don't support a position they want. They don't talk about how Rausserman said Romney would beat Obama in the popular vote either...
That wasn't a poll. That was an opinion by Michael Barone. He was wrong.
You do shed light on an interesting fact, though. Click on THIS PAGE and notice that Rasmussen and Gallup both have Romney up by +1. That's not really remarkable, but what is remarkable is that nearly every pollster uses likely voters. Nowadays, they have gone back to using adults or registered voters - all except Rasmussen. I have no idea why they do that, but I do think it has an effect on the poll results.
Economically disadvantaged poeple don't vote in the same numbers that the middle class does - unless Obama is running. Then they vote. Most pollsters believe that fact is a major contributor toward the distrust people now have in polls.

Last edited by Listener2307; 02-09-2019 at 10:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2019, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,912,657 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
That wasn't a poll. That was an opinion by Michael Barone. He was wrong.
You do shed light on an interesting fact, though. Click on THIS PAGE and notice that Rasmussen and Gallup both have Romney up by +1. That's not really remarkable, but what is remarkable is that nearly every pollster uses likely voters. Nowadays, they have gone back to using adults or registered voters - all except Rasmussen. I have no idea why they do that, but I do think it has an effect on the poll results.
Economically disadvantaged poeple don't vote in the same numbers that the middle class does - unless Obama is running. Then they vote. Most pollsters believe that fact is a major contributor toward the distrust people now have in polls.
I think the distrust in the polls is because people find they don't support their agenda. I feel the reason Hillary lost is partial due to how widely she was expected to actually win. If you know the outcome, why bother voting. I nearly did but I bought into the theory that Arizona was battleground state and voted Hillary to show my displeasure for Trump. If I am not mistaken Romney (whom I voted for in 2012) was closer in the polls than he turned out and not just on national popular voting averages but rather electorally. I think he only gained one or two states from the McCain (whom I voted for in 2008) electoral votes.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that is the main reason people distrust the polls and it would be a great topic for its own thread, but a chunk of it especially with Hillary was the the fact she was destined to win according to nearly every source no matter how liberal biased the organization behind the polls were. This is shown in your link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2019, 04:36 PM
 
5,606 posts, read 3,514,310 times
Reputation: 7414
The Donald,responding to THIS WEEK'S poll.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...65250142056448
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2019, 05:36 PM
 
12,017 posts, read 14,337,386 times
Reputation: 5981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roscoe Conkling View Post
The Donald,responding to THIS WEEK'S poll.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...65250142056448
fake Rasmussen poll?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top