Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2016, 12:59 PM
 
4,095 posts, read 2,569,112 times
Reputation: 3973

Advertisements

Flooding Muslims into any civilized society is akin to releasing the Carp into the Great Lakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:03 PM
 
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
2,765 posts, read 2,795,581 times
Reputation: 2366
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsportpilot View Post
ISIS is not concerned with our gun laws, they will always be able to obtain guns illegally, as will most criminals

a gun ban will only effect legal gun owners, law abiding hard working Americans whom are trying to protect their family from armed criminals and soon ISIS after all the "Refugees" (ISIS operatives) get here

A gun ban will ensure a smooth quiet transition to Sharia Law here in the US
You didn't read my opening post. I addressed committing a crime to obtain an illegal firearm. It's an extra criminal step a potential mass killer would have to perform.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:04 PM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,559,162 times
Reputation: 4471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus View Post
You didn't read my post, did you?

Not all perpetrators of mass killings are Muslim but virtually all weapons in mass killings are guns.

Think about it.
should we ban pressure cookers too? that was the weapon du jour for the Tsarnaev brothers.

Sounds like you're the one who needs to think about this some more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:06 PM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,559,162 times
Reputation: 4471
Quote:
Originally Posted by golimar View Post
Flooding Muslims into any civilized society is akin to releasing the Carp into the Great Lakes.
I agree. especially when our alleged vetting process allows for WAR CRIMINALS to be working at Dulles airport.

An accused war criminal now works security at a U.S. airport - CNN.com

"He is just one of more than 1,000 accused war criminals living and working in the United States."

what could possibly go wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:07 PM
 
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
2,765 posts, read 2,795,581 times
Reputation: 2366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeastah View Post
should we ban pressure cookers too? that was the weapon du jour for the Tsarnaev brothers.

Sounds like you're the one who needs to think about this some more.
That's not a mass killing. While tragic, two people died. I'm not aware of pressure cookers being the weapon of choice among mass killers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:08 PM
 
788 posts, read 513,613 times
Reputation: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus View Post
I use the phrase "banning all guns" for balance in this examination, obviously real gun control would not ban all guns.

So let's proceed.

Some say the key to stopping mass killings is to ban all Muslims entry to the country.

Others say the key to stopping mass killings is to ban guns.

Let's quickly look at the roles each of these two variables play in mass killings.

All mass killings require both a combination of a perpetrator and a weapon to be carried out.

Perpetrator = In some mass killings in the United States, the perpetrator(s) has been Muslim, but not all mass killings. Some mass killings have had non-Muslim perpetrators.

Weapon = In virtually all mass killings in the United States the weapon used has been a firearm. Some contend other weapons can be used, and to a limited extent, things like hatchets and knives make up a small percentage of mass killing weapons. But they tend not to be as efficient as firearms and therefore are usually serve as a second choice. An example of an attempt at a mass killing using a knife outside of the United States involves a knife-wielding perpetrator in China who stabbed 20 school children of which all survived.

So based on the above, if we look for the most common denominator to decide which one we want to ban to control mass killings, the most obvious answer is guns. It's guns and not Muslims because guns are the most common denominator involved in mass killings, not Muslims. It's not Muslims because we know that in some cases the perpetrator is non-Muslim. But the weapon is seldom non-gun.

The most common denominator in mass killings is guns because we know in most cases of mass killings a gun is used as a weapon but a Muslim is not always the perpetrator.

So wouldn't you want to ban the most common denominator in mass killings?

Now some will object to banning guns by saying criminals intent on killing lots of people won't care about guns laws and get guns anyway.

However, if guns were made illegal for civilians (specifically assault weapons) potential mass killers would first have to commit a crime to obtain a gun to use in a mass killing. It follows that if guns were illegal a potential perpetrator of a mass killing could be caught in the act of trying to obtain an illegal firearm before a mass killing and thus be thwarted in performing that future mass killing.

But with guns legal, a potential mass killer criminal can obtain a gun legally without committing a crime to obtain that firearm and proceed to perpetrate a mass killing.

At least with guns illegal criminals would have perform that extra criminal act of obtaining an illegal firearm before they commit a mass killing. Criminals would have to risk getting caught first in obtaining an illegal firearm before a mass killing could occur. And that one crime, if detected, could be enough to deter a mass killing.
Who is the "some" you refer to here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:09 PM
 
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
2,765 posts, read 2,795,581 times
Reputation: 2366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeastah View Post
I agree. especially when our alleged vetting process allows for WAR CRIMINALS to be working at Dulles airport.

An accused war criminal now works security at a U.S. airport - CNN.com

"He is just one of more than 1,000 accused war criminals living and working in the United States."

what could possibly go wrong?
Would Malala act like a carp? Would Muhammad Ali act like a carp?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:10 PM
 
788 posts, read 513,613 times
Reputation: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by golimar View Post
Flooding Muslims into any civilized society is akin to releasing the Carp into the Great Lakes.
More like making a culture of cancer cells, and putting it into the Flu Shot serum distributed nationwide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:11 PM
 
4,095 posts, read 2,569,112 times
Reputation: 3973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus View Post
Would Malala act like a carp? Would Muhammad Ali act like a carp?
Their kids could potentially act as carps.

Islam is an ideology. It can be dormant but when it appears is anyone's guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2016, 01:13 PM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,559,162 times
Reputation: 4471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shankapotomus View Post
That's not a mass killing. While tragic, two people died. I'm not aware of pressure cookers being the weapon of choice among mass killers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Marathon_bombing

the explosion killed 3 and wounded/maimed 264.

but since you're narrowing the scope, how many Americans have died from AR15's vs. died at the hands of Muslims?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top