Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-25-2016, 11:43 AM
 
36,767 posts, read 31,049,568 times
Reputation: 33096

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Does this really need to be explained? Really??

If someone in my family, or a buddy calls me a mick or a wop, which aren't as inflammatory as the *n* word, it's different than someone who is neither, calling me that. Someone of the same background, or a good friend, isn't using it in a derogatory manner.

If someone I don't know well, but is clearly Italian calls me a wop, I know it's his way of trying to establish some commonality between us.

If someone who isn't a friend and isn't Italian uses it, it's offensive. He doesn't have the right to use it.

I'm sure people will argue that they don't care what people call them - but that's not the point - so I'm going to preemptively suggest people who don't get it read what I wrote above several times until it sinks in.
If a particular word is so offensive to a particular group why use it at all. How can a word be the holy grail of racism and offense and a term of endearment at the same time. Seems a bit divergent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-25-2016, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,846 posts, read 17,681,604 times
Reputation: 29386
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
If a particular word is so offensive to a particular group why use it at all. How can a word be the holy grail of racism and offense and a term of endearment at the same time. Seems a bit divergent.

Female friends sometimes call one another the *b* word. Male friends call one another all kinds of things c-d will filter out. Are you suggesting that they should do the same with their bosses or parents or kids teachers?

And are you honestly this confused about how different language is appropriate in some situations and not at all in others?

How does one get through life so confused?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,846 posts, read 17,681,604 times
Reputation: 29386
I'm sensing stupid arguments will continue to be forthcoming, because gosh darn it, some of us just WANT to use the *N* word!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 06:19 AM
 
59,398 posts, read 27,561,222 times
Reputation: 14374
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
You're changing the subject and now discussing the double standard of software.
No I am NOT.

When wasa the last time you actually the word n.... used?

You don't.

Not even when a reporter is telling a story about a person that did.

They ALWAYS say, "he called them "the "N" word".

Whe it is tanlked about they NEVER actually say the word. It s Always, "the "N" word".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 06:38 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,294,796 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"you can't."

Who is stopping me? Certainly NOT you.

And like I said "double standard"!
No you don't.

And yes, there is a double standard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"You might use this word in private and I wouldn't be surprised if you do but you know damn well you're not going around using that word in ear shot of black folks... Don't kid yourself...'

Here you go AGAIN, THINKING you know something and you DON'T have CLUE.

Me and my MANY black friends us it ALL the time when are together when discussing the black low lifes it describes.

No you don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
9,545 posts, read 16,578,643 times
Reputation: 14588
I never hear any complaints when I hear, white people being called white people. So I think the politically correct business has gotten rather nauseating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 07:15 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,702,009 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suburban_Guy View Post
Well, what about the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)?



UGA grad Amy Robach uses 'colored people' on Good Morning America | www.ajc.com
Don't we walk on enough self-imposed eggshells already? Do we really need people like this to add even more? :0=
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,837 posts, read 14,966,991 times
Reputation: 16594
After hearing that comment I had to spend four hours and twelve minutes in my safe space free of micro-aggressions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 07:30 AM
 
5,051 posts, read 3,595,546 times
Reputation: 6512
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Beat me to it.

I don't see much difference between colored people and people of color.

-----

Side note, my brother had to deal with a major labor problem at one of his company's job sites, because a black guy and a Hispanic guy got into an argument. As the Hispanic guy was walking away, one of his buddies walks up to see what was going on. The Hispanic guy who was in the argument told his friend, in Spanish, "That black guy over there is an ass." The black guy heard it, but didn't speak Spanish. It went really downhill from there.
"Colored People" was the preferred term used in the segregated (maybe 40s but I wasn't around then) 50s and 60s to identify separate (and not equal) facilities for non-whites. So yes it has more negative connotations that "People of Color"

Interesting note - some refuse to use the term African American on the ground that it is not only inaccurate but divisive. That certainly does not make them racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2016, 07:45 AM
 
36,767 posts, read 31,049,568 times
Reputation: 33096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
"Colored People" was the preferred term used in the segregated (maybe 40s but I wasn't around then) 50s and 60s to identify separate (and not equal) facilities for non-whites. So yes it has more negative connotations that "People of Color"
Semantics.
Why not just stick with black then. I think we should only use the terms Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid. That should pacify everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top