Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
See this is exactly what is wrong with regurgitating inaccurate information like the media does. Politicus is a hack website that has been called on the carpet before for its inaccurate "reporting." Politicus nor the OP know the difference between a private server and a private email account, yet they both perpetuate the lie that Chaffetz had a private server when he had a gmail account like many other Senators, Dem and Pub alike, that serve with integrity.
Before 2013, there was no way for the government to secure two email accounts on a Blackberry. So our government leaders were required to carry two devices. It is very likely leaders received sensitive email on their Blackberry devices, contrary to what you state below,
No, Hillary requested a secure blackberry at the beginning of her tenure and was denied due to a lack of capability statement.
Quote:
since they were secure, unless they had two email accounts. It is very understandable that our government leaders would not want to carry two devices, and did not want the government IT department to control every bit of data on their phones. It is even understandable why a separate server would be desirable before 2013 to keep a bunch of personal emails out of FOIA productions. It would have been very difficult to manage at Clinton's level, as we have seen.
Clearly the OP does not understand the difficulty our government leaders have in determining what is or should be classified and what is not, or else you are intentionally manipulating a lie.
What lie? I know full well there is disagreement about what is or is not to be classified. That has been plainly stated. The reality is that using a private email for government business will open a person to the possibility of receiving classified information in that private email. Hence him being rightly reported.
Quote:
Comey testified that Clinton lied to the FBI,
That is a lie. Comey stated that he did not believe that Hillary lied to the FBI. It's illegal to lie to the FBI. She would have been prosecuted if he thought that.
Quote:
and that she and her staff were grossly negligent in the handling of classified information through her private server, and we now know that at least five foreign entities hacked into and obtained government information.
From her server? Another lie.
Quote:
Intent is not an element in the statutes that Clinton violated as envisioned by the authors of the statutes, but the FBI applied a rarely (and I mean "rarely") used intent, essentially "rewriting" the statutes to give Clinton a pass. Clinton got a pass, and you just need to admit it. There is no way you can sugar coat that with your little percentages.
Do I think a former first lady should be indicated for that? No, I do not, but I think she should be disqualified from running for president because she lacks judgment to be president. We will see.
Bull. Another person who did not watch the hearings.
No, there are hundreds of thousands of Weiner's emails. You need to put on your thinking cap. Do you think TSC information was being sent to Hillary's blackberry?
Yes. That, or whatever device she was using at the time. The point was it was being sent to and from her via her private unsecured server. Plus, if she forwarded copies of them to Huma, either deliberately or just as a blanket inbox rule because Huma was Hillary's Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Dept while also doing consulting work for the Clinton Foundation and Teneo at the same time, they're all on Anthony Weiner's laptop.
Are you really that unaware of what went on? And you plan to vote based on that lack of info?
And furthermore, if she lacks the comprehension and judgment to understand that something could very well be classified info even if she didn't know what the 'C' meant, she's NOT fit to serve as POTUS.
Why are you so hell-bent on defending someone so utterly incompetent?
For the same what?? What exactly do you think was "reported" that wasn't already openly known?
To have his email account probed for classified information. Hillary's account was openly known as well. She wasn't reported until she decided to run for POTUS.
Yes. That, or whatever device she was using at the time. The point was it was being sent to and from her via her private unsecured server. Plus, if she forwarded copies of them to Huma, either deliberately or just as a blanket inbox rule because Huma was Hillary's Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Dept while also doing consulting work for the Clinton Foundation and Teneo at the same time, they're all on Anthony Weiner's laptop.
Are you really that unaware of what went on? And you plan to vote based on that lack of info?
They stated in the hearings that she never forwarded anything. She made some responses to forwards. That was it.
Exactly. An email account and an email server are two VERY different things.
What difference would it make? All the yelling was about the fact that her system could've been vulnerable to for an entry. The same goes for any public server
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.