Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-24-2016, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,046,690 times
Reputation: 22092

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maccabee 2A View Post
Even if its true they don't make up 80% of all HIV/AIDS positives

Again, encouraging monogamy through marriage would lower those numbers = good for society.

 
Old 11-24-2016, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,604,784 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maccabee 2A View Post
Yes they do. Both are two consenting adults engaging in sexual relations.
The difference is that incest can produce genetically messed up kids, where by definition, homosexuals can't have biological children, so just stop it already!
 
Old 11-24-2016, 03:46 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,628 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Again, encouraging monogamy through marriage would lower those numbers = good for society.
Neat, except nobody has ever argued that gay marriage is intended to or will decrease AIDS/HIV. In fact, you don't need to be married to be monogamous and the gay community is famously not monogamous. In addition, notice that all the gays who claimed that gay marriage is literally the most important thing to them and perhaps one of the greatest rights ever known to mankind got gay marriage (illegally, as I mentioned) and then suddenly didn't care at all about it? Isn't that hilarious? That's probably because they were lying about it the entire time.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 03:47 PM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,809,749 times
Reputation: 15337
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog8food View Post
Just within the last 20 years? After thousands of years of human existence on this earth? It must be something more.
Whatever the reason, it's about damn time. It's nobody's business when two consenting adults want to marry.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 03:48 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,628 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
The difference is that incest can produce genetically messed up kids, where by definition, homosexuals can't have biological children, so just stop it already!
That would also obviate the need for marriage at all. Also, it affirms that, by definition, homosexuals are evolutionarily dead ends.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,046,690 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by njquestions View Post
Neat, except nobody has ever argued that gay marriage is intended to or will decrease AIDS/HIV. In fact, you don't need to be married to be monogamous and the gay community is famously not monogamous. In addition, notice that all the gays who claimed that gay marriage is literally the most important thing to them and perhaps one of the greatest rights ever known to mankind got gay marriage (illegally, as I mentioned) and then suddenly didn't care at all about it? Isn't that hilarious? That's probably because they were lying about it the entire time.

Doesn't matter that Aids/HIV wasn't argued, it's a positive side effect.


Heterosexuals don't need to be married to be monogamous either, yet they marry.


In our society marriage brings positive legal and financial benefits and there is no good reason why homosexual couples shouldn't be able to take advantage of those benefits the same way as heterosexuals.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 04:38 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,628 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Doesn't matter that Aids/HIV wasn't argued, it's a positive side effect.

Except it's not because you're the first person to ever claim it. In other words, just because you randomly say "gay marriage would decrease car accidents in America," that doesn't make it so.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Heterosexuals don't need to be married to be monogamous either, yet they marry.

Except nobody has ever made the argument that heterosexuals get married in order to be monogamous, either. Only you made that argument about gay marriage. That was my point.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
In our society marriage brings positive legal and financial benefits and there is no good reason why homosexual couples shouldn't be able to take advantage of those benefits the same way as heterosexuals.
If there were many positive legal and financial benefits to gay marriage, one would think that more gays would want to get married and yet, oddly, they stopped caring about those legal and financial benefits once gay marriage was illegally mandated into existence. As I said. Gay marriage is a construct that is built on a foundation of lies.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,046,690 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by njquestions View Post
That would also obviate the need for marriage at all. Also, it affirms that, by definition, homosexuals are evolutionarily dead ends.
So are heterosexual married couples who don't or can't have children.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 04:39 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 820,628 times
Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
So are heterosexual married couples who don't or can't have children.
Sure. So a small percentage of heterosexuals are evolutionary dead ends. All homosexuals are.
 
Old 11-24-2016, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,046,690 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by njquestions View Post
Except it's not because you're the first person to ever claim it. In other words, just because you randomly say "gay marriage would decrease car accidents in America," that doesn't make it so.





Except nobody has ever made the argument that heterosexuals get married in order to be monogamous, either. Only you made that argument about gay marriage. That was my point.





If there were many positive legal and financial benefits to gay marriage, one would think that more gays would want to get married and yet, oddly, they stopped caring about those legal and financial benefits once gay marriage was illegally mandated into existence. As I said. Gay marriage is a construct that is built on a foundation of lies.

Some gay couples decide to get married and others don't, just like heterosexuals......so what? Everyone deserves the choice.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top