Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-04-2017, 03:54 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,707,126 times
Reputation: 14051

Advertisements

There are already MILLIONS of job in energy efficiency and renewables.
There are almost no jobs in coal. This was before Trump.

After Trump it will be the same.

Sure, some coal miner somewhere will keep his job. One. Or Two. Or two thousand. But this is not relevant to any degree to the MILLIONS who voted for him thinking that Appalachia will "come back".
The coal jobs are now few and mostly strip mining out west.

The real question behind all of this is what are we going to do about the opiate and welfare addicted masses in "God's Country. If you want just a taste of what is going on, try this article. Generations and generations of people who take every pill under the sun all day every day, paid for by you and I.

One family. Four generations of disability benefits. Will it continue?The number of homes with multiple recipients has risen, especially among the poor. | The Washington Post

So, what would be the bigger question:

1. Wow - we should take away all these benefits and let them die, starve or survive...and give tax cuts to billionaires (this is Trumps idea).

2. Wow - I can't believe we live in a country where millions live like this. What can we do to improve our society, health care and education to avoid this or break the cycle?
(this is how liberals think).

So, that is a quick political test. If you pick #1 you are libertarian or republican. If you pick #2, you are a Democrat or Independent who votes mostly Democratic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2017, 03:59 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,135,271 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by okcthunder1945 View Post
Well you know what time of day the sun is shining.... pretty easy to have a base load of natural gas/nuclear supplemented by solar and wind. Then you have to assume battery storage is a go- nowhere technology.
As you supplement with wind and solar you are idling fossil fuel generation, a very large part of the cost of what you pay for electric is capital investments. Since you can't eliminate those capital costs the cost of generating electric from those plants necessarily rises. If you build a power plant and only need it for one day of the year you still need to pay for the entire capital investment.

If you want an analogy suppose you have a requirement for a vehicle that can be driven 24 hours. This requirement dictates you buy a fossil fuel powered car. You can go out buy a battery operated car to use for 3 hours of that 24 hours but you just doubled your capital investment when the initial capital investment in the gasoline powered car can already meet your requirements.

As far as the battery storage goes it gets much more complicated than that. Let's suppose you have requirement to meet a peak demand of 1 GW. If you have 1 GW of solar capacity and have perfect conditions you might meet those demands for 8 hours. You still have 16 hours left, your capacity requirements just doubled or tripled and you need the means to store it

Here is plausible threshold you need to meet. It's 0 degrees out in the northeast, cloudy, no wind, utilities are hitting record demand at 7AM and it's going to be like that for the next two weeks.

The capacity and storage requirements balloon out of control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:05 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,135,271 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Haha. PHP? preg_split? Seriously, you young whippersnappers don't know what programming is. About all you know how to do is pass arguments to functions already written for you. Back in the day....
Actually it's part of much larger function I originally stole off PHP's page but it looks nothing like the one I stole. Think it's up to about 100 lines now, might be 5 original ones. I was about to pull the trigger on it to change 45K records in a live database when I found the error.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:14 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,347,041 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
As you supplement with wind and solar you are idling fossil fuel generation, a very large part of the cost of what you pay for electric is capital investments. Since you can't eliminate those capital costs the cost of generating electric from those plants necessarily rises. If you build a power plant and only need it for one day of the year you still need to pay for the entire capital investment.

If you want an analogy suppose you have a requirement for a vehicle that can be driven 24 hours. This requirement dictates you buy a fossil fuel powered car. You can go out buy a battery operated car to use for 3 hours of that 24 hours but you just doubled your capital investment when the initial capital investment in the gasoline powered car can already meet your requirements.

As far as the battery storage goes it gets much more complicated than that. Let's suppose you have requirement to meet a peak demand of 1 GW. If you have 1 GW of solar capacity and have perfect conditions you might meet those demands for 8 hours. You still have 16 hours left, your capacity requirements just doubled or tripled and you need the means to store it

Here is plausible threshold you need to meet. It's 0 degrees out in the northeast, cloudy, no wind, utilities are hitting record demand at 7AM and it's going to be like that for the next two weeks.

The capacity and storage requirements balloon out of control.
You just made the case. We will never not need fossil fuels, and the so-called "new technology" is largely impractical.

My former neighbor installed solar panels in his house, and bragged on FB that he generates more than they use; hence, he gets some money back from the electric company. When I asked him how much it cost him to buy and install the equipment (capital investment), it was an outrageous sum (I don't remember the figure he gave me), and he wouldn't get a return on his investment for many, many years (again, I don't remember what he told me). I laughed to myself.

The big lie we're told by people like Barack Obama and other Leftists is that fossil fuels are obsolete and we need to rely more on new technology ...but at what cost? Who's footing the bill? The consumer, of course!

Our country needs cheap energy. Coal, nuclear, gas, and hydro provide it. And it's plentiful. There really is no such thing as "renewable energy." It cannot provide our needs, and if it ever can, it's far, far in the future. And you'd have to be willing to live with the eyesore of windmills and solar farms and all the real estate they require.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:17 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,009,820 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
As you supplement with wind and solar you are idling fossil fuel generation, a very large part of the cost of what you pay for electric is capital investments. Since you can't eliminate those capital costs the cost of generating electric from those plants necessarily rises. If you build a power plant and only need it for one day of the year you still need to pay for the entire capital investment.

If you want an analogy suppose you have a requirement for a vehicle that can be driven 24 hours. This requirement dictates you buy a fossil fuel powered car. You can go out buy a battery operated car to use for 3 hours of that 24 hours but you just doubled your capital investment when the initial capital investment in the gasoline powered car can already meet your requirements.

As far as the battery storage goes it gets much more complicated than that. Let's suppose you have requirement to meet a peak demand of 1 GW. If you have 1 GW of solar capacity and have perfect conditions you might meet those demands for 8 hours. You still have 16 hours left, your capacity requirements just doubled or tripled and you need the means to store it

Here is plausible threshold you need to meet. It's 0 degrees out in the northeast, cloudy, no wind, utilities are hitting record demand at 7AM and it's going to be like that for the next two weeks.

The capacity and storage requirements balloon out of control.
We already have that spare capacity waiting. lots of gas runs about 5% of the time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:18 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,009,820 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
You just made the case. We will never not need fossil fuels, and the so-called "new technology" is largely impractical.

My former neighbor installed solar panels in his house, and bragged on FB that he generates more than they use; hence, he gets some money back from the electric company. When I asked him how much it cost him to buy and install the equipment (capital investment), it was an outrageous sum (I don't remember the figure he gave me), and he wouldn't get a return on his investment for many, many years (again, I don't remember what he told me). I laughed to myself.

The big lie we're told by people like Barack Obama and other Leftists is that fossil fuels are obsolete and we need to rely more on new technology ...but at what cost? Who's footing the bill? The consumer, of course!

Our country needs cheap energy. Coal, nuclear, gas, and hydro provide it. And it's plentiful. There really is no such thing as "renewable energy." It cannot provide our needs, and if it ever can, it's far, far in the future. And you'd have to be willing to live with the eyesore of windmills and solar farms and all the real estate they require.
Simple payback on my son's house in DC was 5 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:19 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,347,041 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
If they are cheaper then why was the solar industry crying over the possibility of the tax credit not getting extended? Dire warnings about massive job losses from the industry, were they lying?

Even if the watt per watt cost is lower they still cannot replace coal, natural gas, hydro or nuclear. You can only supplement those sources of power, you cannot replace.
Very true. And there really is no need to supplement those sources. For what purpose? There is no gain. But there is a lot of pain!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:23 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,347,041 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMS02760 View Post
Another job factor in addition to the diminishing demand for coal is the increased automation used to mine coal. Automation is replacing workers. It is more productive and free from most all safety concerns. It is a HUGE reason why there are far fewer coal jobs. Getting rid of regulations and environmental safeguards will not bring these jobs back.
The "diminishing demand for coal" was manufactured by regulation! Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:24 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,135,271 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
We already have that spare capacity waiting. lots of gas runs about 5% of the time
Are you trying to make my arguments for me? In other words more capacity from solar and wind is redundant and simply adds unnecessary expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 04:25 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,135,271 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Simple payback on my son's house in DC was 5 years.
On the backs of the taxpayer and the ratepayer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top