Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, I'm down for making them give up their voting rights as well. Since right wingers mistakenly believe poor people vote Democrat, this should not be a problem for conservatives. Hint: poor people tend to vote conservative.
If you honestly believe in taking anyone's voting rights, I wish you would stop calling yourself a liberal. You soil the term each time you use it.
I think if enough of us pool our money together, we can get this thing started, particularly if we can get some liberals to put their money where their mouth is.
Actually, we don't even need to pay people monthly. Just offering $2000 in exchange for voluntary sterilization would be enough.
And then what? Do you give them jobs, education, training or do they just remain poor with no capacity for bearing children? What's to stop them from adopting a child or raising a relative's child?
And then what? Do you give them jobs, education, training or do they just remain poor with no capacity for bearing children? What's to stop them from adopting a child or raising a relative's child?
Make part of the deal no raising kids. We would have social workers check in on them.
And then what? Do you give them jobs, education, training or do they just remain poor with no capacity for bearing children? What's to stop them from adopting a child or raising a relative's child?
No one is saying we have all the answers. No doubt the idea of the OP will need lots of debugging and patchings.
And then what? Do you give them jobs, education, training or do they just remain poor with no capacity for bearing children? What's to stop them from adopting a child or raising a relative's child?
So you are just doing the same thing as "the government" , giving people money to sit around and do nothing.
Correction. Give them money to prevent them from producing more people who will be dependent on the system. As I said before, the result won't be seen for at east a generation. But I think it will be worth it.
So you are just doing the same thing as "the government" , giving people money to sit around and do nothing.
Incorrect. We would be cutting off the perpetual culture of poverty because those people don't breed anymore.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
