Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-28-2017, 06:12 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,522,211 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bxlover View Post
What do the conservatives call people who they disagree with ?
Wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2017, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,301 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by irish_bob View Post
o reilly while an obnoxious bully , had a strong intellect , hannity is a D student who happened to just get picked due to his complete lack of ethics and willingness to do what he,s told by the boss

hes an ultra reliable water carrier

I actually enjoyed O'Reilly he was intelligent and mostly fair, Hannity offers nothing but is tremendously popular with his conspiracy theories. He goes way overboard looking for something that doesn't exist whether it's Cliven Bundy, Benghazi or Seth Rich. His program was devoted to criticizing Obama and making him a one term president. He and some others give Fox News a bad name, hard to believe that a network with Chris Wallace would have him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2017, 07:47 AM
 
7,855 posts, read 10,291,736 times
Reputation: 5615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I actually enjoyed O'Reilly he was intelligent and mostly fair, Hannity offers nothing but is tremendously popular with his conspiracy theories. He goes way overboard looking for something that doesn't exist whether it's Cliven Bundy, Benghazi or Seth Rich. His program was devoted to criticizing Obama and making him a one term president. He and some others give Fox News a bad name, hard to believe that a network with Chris Wallace would have him.
o reilly had such an ego , he ended up making every single thing about himself

fox news is a propoganda machine for the GOP but you could still listen to thee odd interesting view from the likes of o reilly , krauthammer or the reptilian bill krystol who though utterly evil , is a smart man

hannity is a douche and nothing else
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2017, 07:54 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,311,358 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by MongooseHugger View Post
Obviously, we know that Murdoch's sons are trying to take down the good guys on Fox. However, I think some Soros groups are also involved.


I believe that these three groups are almost certainly involved:

1.) Color of Change (they pulled similar tactics against ALEC-supporting companies over ALEC's support of voter ID in 2011. Also, they are a Soros group.)
2.) Media Matters (Soros Media mob )
3.) MoveOn.org (Another militant Soros group that helps him a lot)
You are absolutely correct, and there are no doubt others, all primarily Soros funded. Are you aware that George Soros is the primary benefactor of Wikipedia, and also the Southern Poverty Law Center (who may be one of the organizations going after Hannnity also)? I mention Wikipedia because they cite the SPLC in there smearing articles on conservatives like Brigitte Gabriel and Pamela Geller, whom they label "Islamophobes."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2017, 08:01 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike;48297824[B
]Buddy, it's nothing but money.
[/b]
Rupert Murdoch dropped over $15 million dollars paying off the women who were laying sexual harassment charges on Ailes and O'Reilley, and that money was spent before the flood of other women began coming forth with charges of their own.

Fox News wasn't even Murdoch's greatest concern. He's trying to buy the Sky network in England, and has to get the government OK to do it. It's a huge deal, which will make Murdoch the kingpin of English TV- it's like owning CBS and NBC combined, as he already owns Sky's largest competitor.

He simply couldn't afford Fox screwing up the Sky deal, so he sent in his sons to clean house. Once they took over, they found the harassment had gone deeper, so they canned Ailes' second in command, the guy who had drinking problems, and have given the word to Hannity to clean up his act or else.

They probably aren't done yet. They have to show the British government that Fox is a reputable news organization that doesn't allow harassment or report phony news stories. The Sky deal has been hanging fire for over a year, and Murdoch needs to either get the deal of his life done or it will disappear and never happen.

There's no conspiracy. The Murdochs simply took back the control over what they owned, and are putting a lot of people who thought they were more important than they are in their place.

Sean Hannity was ordered to stop reporting the fake story about Seth Rich, and he defied his bosses. And in his defiance, began to cost Murdoch money. And lose face.

Hannity got too big for his britches. He forgot the basic rule of holding a job; when the boss tells you to do something, you do it.
^^^^ this poster got it exactly right. It's always about the money and Sky News is the brass ring for Murdoch. IF he has to fire Hannity to seal the deal - he will. End of story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
The Confederacy lost. Most people in the rural South (and I live in the South) still cannot accept that the Confederacy lost, despite the fact it was 150 years ago and the last person who had anything to do with it died in the 1950s. They ask us to get over losing the 2016 election. How about they get over the Civil War?
Excellent point. The south will NEVER get over the civil war and I can say that having grown up in AL.

Losers usually do not get to erect statues. The ultimate participation trophy is this instance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2017, 08:07 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,311,358 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Hannity is his own worst enemy with this Rich Seth conspiracy theory, he has infuriated the family and the advertisers. No need for anyone to go after him, he is doing a good job destroying his sad career on his own. Infowars seems to be the obvious next step in his career.
This is pure B.S. This is not a conspiracy theory. The man was killed and not one thing taken from his body. Nothing. This was no robbery, and there isn't a shred of evidence that it was. But we know how many deaths surround the Clintons. They are probably surrounded by more bodies than any other politicians you can name. So, you have to ask, "why?" Well, think about that. How corrupt are the Clintons? How many scandals surround the Clintons? If Seth Rich was leaking to Wikileaks, information about the Clintons, it's a pretty safe bet that's why he was killed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2017, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,239,172 times
Reputation: 28324
Man, that Soros gets around!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2017, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,941,526 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
This is pure B.S. This is not a conspiracy theory. The man was killed and not one thing taken from his body. Nothing. This was no robbery, and there isn't a shred of evidence that it was. But we know how many deaths surround the Clintons. They are probably surrounded by more bodies than any other politicians you can name. So, you have to ask, "why?" Well, think about that. How corrupt are the Clintons? How many scandals surround the Clintons? If Seth Rich was leaking to Wikileaks, information about the Clintons, it's a pretty safe bet that's why he was killed.
Give it break, conspiracy theories are clouding your mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top