Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-04-2017, 07:33 AM
 
5,661 posts, read 3,523,779 times
Reputation: 5155

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve40th View Post
Obama ran this scam and the Trans atlantic trade deal. All NOT in the best interest of the USA, especially finacially. Obama did it, Trump undid it.
Exactly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2017, 07:33 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,071 posts, read 17,014,369 times
Reputation: 30219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atalanta View Post
Obama under handeingly signed this Paris thing without it passing through our Senate.
He signed an Executive Order.

If you all want to be mad about this whole thing, put the blame where blame is due.!

It is not a Treaty it is not law abiding.

Obama was sneaky.
And I believe he did so, because on his agenda train he was set out to bring down America.
It is difficult to find others who agree with me on both Obama's agenda and on the "chicken little" aspect of belief in "climate change."

Obama spelled out his intent to equalize the U.S. with other countries in his April 4, 2009 press conference or speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 07:35 AM
 
4,798 posts, read 3,509,747 times
Reputation: 2301
Trump should have used the Senate vote for 2 reasons:

1 - To force the entire GOP caucus to go on record where they stand in regard to destroying our economy for the climate hoax. It is the only way Trump is going to be able to get some of those idiots to start working with him on other issues. If he boxes them into a corner on this, they will be more inclined to work with him on other issues out of fear he will cause them serious re-election problems.

2 - By rescinding this non-binding, non-treaty (that was being treated as a legitimate treaty) without involving the Senate, Trump reinforced the precedent set by obama, that the executive branch can set treaties as easily as issuing an executive order. He should have gone through the extra step of getting it rescinded in the Senate, which would have easily happened, then stood up and explained to the American people WHY he did it that way. (And if the Senate refused, he could have done it the way he did anyway.)

It was a missed opportunity to educate the American people on how our treaty process works and to force the Senate into a corner so they might be more amicable to work with on future issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 07:45 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,071 posts, read 17,014,369 times
Reputation: 30219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why shouldn't the wealthier nations have to pay the majority of the costs, they are responsible for the damage inflicted on these poor countries. The US share was $3B, rather small compared to our impact, but to state that the US has no money to spare is laughable.
On the receiving end of the largess who is receiving the money and what is going to happen to it? The wealthy nations will pay in spades. Will anyone but the holders of Swiss bank accounts or the bureaucrats passing goodies around benefit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 07:52 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,071 posts, read 17,014,369 times
Reputation: 30219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve40th View Post
Trump should have used the Senate vote for 2 reasons:

1 - To force the entire GOP caucus to go on record where they stand in regard to destroying our economy for the climate hoax. It is the only way Trump is going to be able to get some of those idiots to start working with him on other issues. If he boxes them into a corner on this, they will be more inclined to work with him on other issues out of fear he will cause them serious re-election problems.

2 - By rescinding this non-binding, non-treaty (that was being treated as a legitimate treaty) without involving the Senate, Trump reinforced the precedent set by obama, that the executive branch can set treaties as easily as issuing an executive order. He should have gone through the extra step of getting it rescinded in the Senate, which would have easily happened, then stood up and explained to the American people WHY he did it that way. (And if the Senate refused, he could have done it the way he did anyway.)

It was a missed opportunity to educate the American people on how our treaty process works and to force the Senate into a corner so they might be more amicable to work with on future issues.
You make some good points but I respectfully disagree. The precedent set would have been acknowledging that there was anything to rescind when there really wasn't. The Senate never ratified it so the Senate never had a role. Also if Trump went the route you suggest there would be a good argument that a 2/3 vote would have been required. Getting that would be most unlikely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 07:55 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
Didn't you ever hear of the money tree, there is one in every liberals back yard.
Please don't kid yourself. Liberals only spend other people's money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 08:01 AM
 
4,798 posts, read 3,509,747 times
Reputation: 2301
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
You make some good points but I respectfully disagree. The precedent set would have been acknowledging that there was anything to rescind when there really wasn't. The Senate never ratified it so the Senate never had a role. Also if Trump went the route you suggest there would be a good argument that a 2/3 vote would have been required. Getting that would be most unlikely.
Obama never went the route of the Senate, which law dictates. So, if the Senate wanted to ratify this accord, then they would be acknowledging the executive branch can do a treaty without them. Win, lose, doesnt matter. Obamas admin skirted the law of our land, and this proves it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 08:06 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Stop thinking about yourself. You are not that important...none of us are. Think about your children and their children. If we don't protect this planet the future is doomed. You have to look at the big picture
The problem is at this point in time WE are the only ones that have seriously worked to clean up and given the contents of the "accord" we'd be the only ones that would in the future.

Why aren't people mad about the other countries like China that are DOUBLE the CO2 rate that we are AND going higher with plans to go higher yet? The U.S. is in fact, and will continue working to reduce pollution levels with or without that silly Accord.

I'll say it again, when other countries actually move to drop their pollution levels then maybe a FAIR agreement can be forged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 08:06 AM
 
4,798 posts, read 3,509,747 times
Reputation: 2301
I find it funny that people think taking a 100 billion a year out of our tax money, giving it to 3rd world dictators is smart business.. Read the accord, there are no guarantees or accountability other than yearly shindigs to party. Its a global slush fund like the Clinton Foundation.. Fraud.
Ice Age, Ozone depleting, DET on plants, Hair Spray, Oceans drying up, Polar cap melting, MMGW, etc etc All Liberal/Socialist scams. Cant anyone see how throughout the last century and now all they do is cry wolf.
A major earthquake shifted the earth axis, weather patterns changed.
Mt St Helen dumped more toxins in the air than man has in 10000 years..
Get a fricking clue and a Farmers Almanac..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2017, 08:13 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve40th View Post
I find it funny that people think taking a 100 billion a year out of our tax money, giving it to 3rd world dictators is smart business.. Read the accord, there are no guarantees or accountability other than yearly shindigs to party. Its a global slush fund like the Clinton Foundation.. Fraud.
Ice Age, Ozone depleting, DET on plants, Hair Spray, Oceans drying up, Polar cap melting, MMGW, etc etc All Liberal/Socialist scams. Cant anyone see how throughout the last century and now all they do is cry wolf.
A major earthquake shifted the earth axis, weather patterns changed.
Mt St Helen dumped more toxins in the air than man has in 10000 years..
Get a fricking clue and a Farmers Almanac..
Maybe one of the "weeeeeeee arrrrrrreeee doooooommmmmed people on here could invent a Catalytic Converter exhaust system or a giant Cork for those volcanos that you speak of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top