Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wonder why the NYTimes is getting rid of over 1/2 of their Editors - they are apparently (according to the Leftists) doing quite well. Why the staff reduction if everything is better than Hunky-Dory??
Love the "protest" signs ...... "No Editors - No Peace".
NYT is a legacy print media company. Their bread and butter has always been ad revenue. In those times past they could afford to be top heavy.
The Internet/ digital media changed the business model and substantially reduced ad revenue for all print media.
So many media jobs can now be performed by contractors, not FTE with pensions and other benefits.
You really play the "personal attack" card a lot. I think you are too sensitive for POC forum. You might want to take a leave of absence.
Common tactic to use by some folks, they claim injury for the slightest thing to try and get others banned. Its often surprisingly effective, and by banning the most vocal critics they can easier "redpill" a forum.
November it was a tad over 10. Trumps been great for their stock!
It was $4 in 2009 so Obama was really good for them as well. We'll see what happens. Maybe they can downsize more, they already sold their building and leased back 7 floors, and build a bottom line. Right now they're in the red, so downsizing is the smart thing to do. Again, we'll see in the coming years what happens.
Keep in mind this country is conservative leaning in general, so they have effectively cut half their market out by being so blatantly partisan. If I were running a paper I'd try to play to the entire audience. Politics aside, the bottom line is the bottom line.
It was $4 in 2009 so Obama was really good for them as well. We'll see what happens. Maybe they can downsize more, they already sold their building and leased back 7 floors, and build a bottom line. Right now they're in the red, so downsizing is the smart thing to do. Again, we'll see in the coming years what happens.
Keep in mind this country is conservative leaning in general, so they have effectively cut half their market out by being so blatantly partisan. If I were running a paper I'd try to play to the entire audience. Politics aside, the bottom line is the bottom line.
Red? Latest financials showed black. Do they lean left? Yes on the editorial section. But what news source is bipartisan? Look at the ney York post. Flagrantly right. Let's be honest. There is money in echo chambers. You yourself I believe said you no longer subscribe. Not your Eco chamber.
The Mexican owned blog called the NY Times is falling apart.
When the New York Times later dug up allegations of Trump’s sexual harassment, he claimed reporters were acting as “corporate lobbyists for Carlos Slim,” a reference to his 17 percent holding in the newspaper company, the biggest individual shareholder.
What's funnier is the left's reaction to your colorful description of the NYTimes.
Must be hitting the mark.
No. Just shows his inability to do business valuation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
