Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, I'm concerned about politicization, at this point. I take my chances with Scalia and Thomas law clerks being nominated and confirmed for the federal judiciary, district, circuit, supreme. It is all good. And as I had to remind your buddy evil cart, this conservative does not live in fear.
That is for progressives.
Name the decisions that need correcting over the last 8 years that caused all this concern with so called activist courts. One or two will suffice.
Executive orders are not bills and speaks volumes regarding his inability to work even within his own party to get legislation passed. I doubt that he even understands what he is signing most of the time, like the celebration over that pile of dirt passed in the house a few months back.
Did I say Executive Orders?
NO I did NOT.
Your poor attempt to distort what I said says volumes.
Your outright bias refuses you to accept ANY good news about Trump.
Or maybe you just have reading comprehension problem
Either way you are acting just like the LSM, make claims with NO FACTS to back it up.
Your poor attempt to distort what I said says volumes.
Your outright bias refuses you to accept ANY good news about Trump.
Or maybe you just have reading comprehension problem
Either way you are acting just like the LSM, make claims with NO FACTS to back it up.
So what were the significant bills that were on his agenda that he helped push through congress, what bill that he passed compares to any of the signed by past presidents. Maybe it's just quantity that matters, not substance.
So what were the significant bills that were on his agenda that he helped push through congress, what bill that he passed compares to any of the signed by past presidents. Maybe it's just quantity that matters, not substance.
Sorry you CAN'T change the dialogue ( it's called, moving the goalposts) AFTER you have been proven wrong.
You said Trump hasn't done ANYTHING, PERIOD. No qualifiers, etc.
I proved you WRONG. Period!
OBVIOUSLY you don't think any of those things Trump signed were "of substance"
Many of us do.
AS they say, "beauty is in the mind of the beholder"
Sorry you CAN'T change the dialogue ( it's called, moving the goalposts) AFTER you have been proven wrong.
You said Trump hasn't done ANYTHING, PERIOD. No qualifiers, etc.
I proved you WRONG. Period!
OBVIOUSLY you don't think any of those things Trump signed were "of substance"
Many of us do.
AS they say, "beauty is in the mind of the beholder"
So he signed 28 bills, where was the ACA and the wall. Sounds desperate to be counting bills to make his first year meaningful. So which of those bills compares to something like the ACA, this isn't a sporting event where you keep score on total numbers.
"it's a shame that Trump is now attempting to politicize the courts well beyond any of his predecessors."
Surely you jest!
NO ONE has politicized the judicial process like the dems.
You truly ARE biased!
The GOP wants to change the process that has been in place for decades and stack the court with conservative justices and your claiming that "the dems have politicized the process", now that's funny.
When unions were actively participating in the Democratic Party... nobody complained... Citizens United is Karma...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.