Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again we aren't talking about the legal system the statute of limitations has run out so the issue at hand is the current election and whether or not the accusation is credible. I say the accusation is credible and based on that in my opinion is Roy Moore is unfit to serve.
More fake news. Where were these women 30 years ago???? I hope Judge Moore sues for defamation and bankrupts these liars.
It there something in your past that makes you immediately think men are guilty based upon a single accusation? Is there some guilt in your past that is tainting your view?
The bottom line is that allegations of child molestation against Roy Moore is a factor to be considered in whether to cast your vote for or against him. The Statute of Limitations bar a trial so we we the voters are the jury.
I believe the victims.
You either are for the perv or not.
So, if you don't automatically believe an accusation, you are on the side of perverts and rapists?
My goodness, some of you are crazy.
Y'all would have really had a great time back in the Middle Ages with the witch trials.
If someone accused your son and there was no evidence, would you believe him?
I, too, think that if multiple women are willing to go public on the record. There is something there.
I would also always believe my daughter on a matter so personal.
Actually I'm arguing that his guilt or innocence is innate and essentially unknowable for someone who wasn't there. People regularly are released after DNA evidence overturns their prior conviction. I'm sure there just as many people who beat a conviction that would have been justified.
I'm also arguing that what's considered a reasonable doubt varies considerably, even from the criminal to the civil courts, and especially in the court of public opinion. And, when it comes to the court of public opinion, who the person is matters a great deal on how much evidence is needed. If you're a Republican, you will generally need less evidence for a Democrat and more evidence for a fellow Republican; the converse is true for Democrats.
I don't care That he is Democrat or Republican I care about facts and that being he is innocent until he is PROVEN guilty by evidence. Maybe we can just burn him tied to a stake like they did in Salem. I'm not arguing anything, this is not a debate I'm stating the fact.
I, too, think that if multiple women are willing to go public on the record. There is something there.
I would also always believe my daughter on a matter so personal.
This must be breaking news. Where did anyone else make an accusation of sexual assault or sexual contact with an underage besides the one?
Bill Cosby victims waited over 20 years to speak out
Some Weinstein victims waited decades as well
But I can’t expect much from people who voted for a man that think its acceptable to grab woman by their private parts
/thread.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Stop squirming, please...
