Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon
11,269 posts, read 11,035,002 times
Reputation: 19757

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by saturno_v View Post
One of the two is in for the long run, the other, luckily, will be replaced soon....
That liberal hag will die serving before she allows her position to be filled during the Trump administration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:24 PM
 
1,184 posts, read 720,980 times
Reputation: 884
Nap time at taxpayers expense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,213,992 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchlights View Post
That liberal hag will die serving before she allows her position to be filled during the Trump administration.
Dems will keep her on life support for years until the next Dem is in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:31 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,598,766 times
Reputation: 16439
This should put the rogue, so-called judges in line. We are much safer already because of this ruling. Christmas will be merry and bright this year!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:33 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,427 posts, read 60,623,477 times
Reputation: 61042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmyy View Post
But not Saudi Arabia.
You'd have to ask Obama Administration officials why Saudi Arabia wasn't on their list of recommendations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:34 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,767,070 times
Reputation: 15667
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBaldBlur View Post
MAGA win!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:37 PM
 
Location: NC
5,129 posts, read 2,599,470 times
Reputation: 2398
9th circuit loses again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:38 PM
 
3,569 posts, read 2,522,703 times
Reputation: 2290
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yes, this is all mostly meaningless where terrorism is concerned. Many cheering don't consider the big picture either. The president had the absolute right to do this because the federal government controls immigration.
So, you don't think the Constitution applies to the federal govenment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by doggiedog9 View Post
Great. Those lower courts who blocked the ban got egg on face lol should resign
Not at all. This remains in the hands of the 9th Circuit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by saturno_v View Post
This is a HUGE win for Trump....I do not think many people still realize that....and by a 7-2 vote....

It basically put in the shredder months of endless debate and media posturing.

Do you remember all the screams of unconstitutionality??? Ahahahahaah LOL
So . . . I take it you didn't bother reading the article, much less the court's order? This is a procedural order. While the lower court cases are pending, the lower court ruling is stayed--meaning the 3rd version of the EO (narrowed in several ways) is in effect pending SC decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,462 posts, read 7,096,830 times
Reputation: 11708
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yes, this is all mostly meaningless where terrorism is concerned. Many cheering don't consider the big picture either. The president had the absolute right to do this because the federal government controls immigration.
What?

People who supported the ban were screaming this from the rooftops when bleeding heart terror sympathizers were crying "Muslim Ban!!"

We KNEW the SC would overturn the 9th circuit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 03:40 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,664,869 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
Most Democrats don't care one way or the other.

Some Trumpists here are happy because they think this will upset the lefties. Most lefties won't be upset about this.
You are correct. We see what they care about.
Gaining power and weakening the country in every possible way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top