Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since it is meaningless, explain why the lower Cory’s blocked it. An answer other than liberal obstruction is BS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber
Yes, I would argue there are very few Americans in those countries, and very few people from those countries would attempt to travel to US. It has been next to impossible to get a visas in those countries with or without a ban. In other words, the whole thing is meaningless, especially when Saudi Arabia is missing from the list. As a matter of fact, it will probably cause more harm than good.
Since it is meaningless, explain why the lower Cory’s blocked it. An answer other than liberal obstruction is BS.
Meaningless for the reasons I already listed, plus the fact that people from these countries, even Iran, can still travel to US. You can read the lower courts arguments on Google if you are not yet educated on them.
Not at all. This remains in the hands of the 9th Circuit.
So . . . I take it you didn't bother reading the article, much less the court's order? This is a procedural order. While the lower court cases are pending, the lower court ruling is stayed--meaning the 3rd version of the EO (narrowed in several ways) is in effect pending SC decision.
I bet the ban will be kept on place....wanna bet??
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.