Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482

Advertisements

"The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment was originally set to expire on Friday (see update above), which would open the door for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to do what he's been hinting he wants to: Launch a federal war on states that have partly or completely legalized marijuana use."

"This will-they-or-won't-they game is why Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, and a bipartisan group of 24 other lawmakers have introduced the Respect State Marijuana Laws Act of 2017, which would prevent the federal government from prosecuting any marijuana users, growers or distributors who are in compliance with state laws."

https://www.salon.com/2017/12/08/jef...gress-let-him/

I wonder why this already-unpopular presidential administration would do anything so unpopular.

Well, actually, no I don't. But there it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:16 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
16,960 posts, read 17,345,504 times
Reputation: 30258
I could care less about weed, but what he "wants" is wishful thinking, imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:19 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,812,515 times
Reputation: 11338
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
"The Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment was originally set to expire on Friday (see update above), which would open the door for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to do what he's been hinting he wants to: Launch a federal war on states that have partly or completely legalized marijuana use."

"This will-they-or-won't-they game is why Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, and a bipartisan group of 24 other lawmakers have introduced the Respect State Marijuana Laws Act of 2017, which would prevent the federal government from prosecuting any marijuana users, growers or distributors who are in compliance with state laws."

https://www.salon.com/2017/12/08/jef...gress-let-him/

I wonder why this already-unpopular presidential administration would do anything so unpopular.

Well, actually, no I don't. But there it is.
Trump's base will love this, even though a majority of Americans won't. Most conservatives, especially the older generation, view marijuana as sinful against God and as a detriment to the moral fabric of society. Therefore, we must crack down on it, forcing states that have legalized it to criminalize it again and increasing the penalty and enforcement of the laws against it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:28 AM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,142,126 times
Reputation: 13661
Doesn't he have anything better to do with his time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:35 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,338,692 times
Reputation: 20828
It might be worth noting that Rep Rohrabacher (whose district encompasses primarily the more-libertarian southern half of Orange County) has a long history of independent thinking -- particularly with regard to social issues. He was one of the leaders of a faction which broke away from the campus conservative group Young Americans for Freedom back in 1969, and formed the nucleus of the modern Libertarian Party.

These California Congresspersons Voted to INCREASE Your Taxes

These California Congresspersons Voted to INCREASE Your Taxes

https://rohrabacher.house.gov/

So much for "monolithic conservatism".

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 12-10-2017 at 01:04 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:37 AM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,630,428 times
Reputation: 17966
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
Trump's base will love this, even though a majority of Americans won't. Most conservatives, especially the older generation, view marijuana as sinful against God and as a detriment to the moral fabric of society. Therefore, we must crack down on it, forcing states that have legalized it to criminalize it again and increasing the penalty and enforcement of the laws against it.
22 states that voted for the Trump creature, with well over 200 electoral votes, have some sort of legal marijuana laws. Go for it, Sessions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 12:46 AM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,142,126 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
It might be worth noting that Rep Rohrabacher (whose district encompasses primarily the more-libertarian southern half of Orange County) has a long history of independent thinking -- particularly with regard to social issues. He was one of the leaders of a faction which broke away from the campus youth group Young Americans for Freedom back in 1969, and formed the nucleus of the modern Libertarian Party.

https://rohrabacher.house.gov/

So much for "monolithic conservatism".
Yep. It seems like a lot of people assume that all conservatives are puritan Bible thumpers, but that's not at all the case. It seems that nowadays, more and more conservatives are basing their arguments on secular principles and logic rather than defaulting straight to religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 01:04 AM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,630,428 times
Reputation: 17966
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
Yep. It seems like a lot of people assume that all conservatives are puritan Bible thumpers, but that's not at all the case. It seems that nowadays, more and more conservatives are basing their arguments on secular principles and logic rather than defaulting straight to religion.
That may be, but the Puritan bible-thumping nut cases are still the ones these so-called "moderate" conservtives are voting into office. So as far as I'm concerned, they're all one and the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 01:16 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,338,692 times
Reputation: 20828
I don't care whether the opposition is a Bible-thumping Fundamentalist or a dinosaur who still believes in the New Deal; both are authoritarians seeking to impose their personal beliefs on all of us. Like Marxists and Nazis, they're both the fruit of a poisonous plant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2017, 01:35 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,371,062 times
Reputation: 23858
Seeing that there are now 4 states where pot is legal, I think Sessions could better use his time coming up with a plan to make the federal and state laws line up better, instead trying to mess with state's rights.

I live in a state that's halfway between 2 others where pot is legal.
As it is now, anyone who attempts to transport legal pot from one to the other state, where the sale is legal in both, runs a risk of being busted for felony possession and could go to prison.

Several transporters have gone to prison for just this in the past couple of years here. The pot was grown in one state and was being transported for sale in the other.

I don't think that's right. Any goods that are grown legally in their state or origin, and are consigned for sale in another state where purchasing those goods is also legal should be able to more those goods without breaking the law.

Alcohol sales are still not legal in all states, but the transporters aren't busted for moving it from one state to another where it is legal in both, and I think that marijuana should be the same. Just like alcohol, pot should be sealed, taxed, stamped. invoiced, and carried by bonded carriers without fear of legal jeopardy when the product is sold in properly legal channels.

The federal government is in charge of interstate commerce, so the transport laws should change. If the federal government wants to take the issue of legality up with the states, then that's what the courts are for.

But as it stands, it's now an arbitrary penalization of free interstate trade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top