Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Better described as a citizen venting over a political outcome of which he was not fond. Being a ranking FBI agent does not revoke your citizenship or your right to complain about an outcome.
The IG's finding is that no action was taken against Trump.
Wrong in all respects.
A "citizen" can't stop someone from being elected. Strzok was in a position where he thought he could, and he said he would.
Moreover, the OIG report had nothing to do with the Russia investigation and therefore says nothing about any actions taken against Trump. It does, however, state that the statements of Page and Strzok indicated bias and implied a "willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects."
Last edited by hbdwihdh378y9; 06-17-2018 at 02:45 PM..
They WERE informed--
Steele told them
The Australian ambassador told them
That's the point. The Australian ambassador did not "inform" them. He said he heard something from someone who heard it from someone else. That's not informing the FBI of meddling; that's informing them of the existence of a rumor.
Not to mention that "meddling" isn't even a crime that the FBI can investigate.
Republicans have been launching investigations for decades.
In the last 50 some years, Republicans have convicted exactly 1 person from a Democratic administration. The Chief of Staff for the Secretary of Agriculture was once convicted of failing to report a small consulting sum from a former consulting company.
89 convictions in Republican administrations. 89.
That doesn't include Nixon who was pardoned of all a crimes before the indictment stage.
Nor does it include all those who would have been indicted and convicted if Bush 1 hadn't pardoned those Iran/Contra criminals.
Republicans are forever pointing the finger at others but are by far the most criminally corrupt political party.
That's the point. The Australian ambassador did not "inform" them. He said he heard something from someone who heard it from someone else. That's not informing the FBI of meddling; that's informing them of the existence of a rumor.
Not to mention that "meddling" isn't even a crime that the FBI can investigate.
Conspiracy is the term you are looking for. Conspiracy with a hostile foreign government to interfere in U.S. elections.
We've been over this numerous times, but for those just coming out of a coma,
Eye opening piece by a former national security analyst.
"The counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump was kicked off by not one, not two, but multiple SIGINT reports which set off alarm bells inside our Intelligence Community."
For example, "Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ – Britain’s NSA), which “first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious ‘interactions’ between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, passed this information on to the U.S. "as part of a routine exchange of information.”
A "citizen" can't stop someone from being elected. Strzok was in a position where he thought he could, and he said he would.
Moreover, the OIG report had nothing to do with the Russia investigation and therefore says nothing about any actions taken against Trump. It does, however, state that the statements of Page and Strzok indicated bias and implied a "willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects."
Nope. He had no ability to prevent the election of anyone. He is an FBI agent not a dictator. As Page pointed out they are Americans and have a right to have opinions.
Nope. He had no ability to prevent the election of anyone. He is an FBI agent not a dictator. As Page pointed out they are Americans and have a right to have opinions.
Not only did he not have the ability to prevent anyone's election, as far as I can tell the only campaign that was undermined by the FBI was Clinton's.
Mum's the word about the investigation into Trump's Russian connections but they wouldn't shut up about Clinton's emails.
Giuliani is now going around bragging about how "good" FBI agents were leaking information on the investigation to him.
Eye opening piece by a former national security analyst.
"The counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump was kicked off by not one, not two, but multiple SIGINT reports which set off alarm bells inside our Intelligence Community."
For example, "Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ – Britain’s NSA), which “first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious ‘interactions’ between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, passed this information on to the U.S. "as part of a routine exchange of information.”
That article you cited is a joke. Did even you read it? references this: "all the evidence must remain super secret" - sure it does - and we have a bridge to sell you. gullible guppies of the left unite.
Last edited by Ibginnie; 06-18-2018 at 05:59 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
