Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
3,614 posts, read 1,747,631 times
Reputation: 2740

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Ask yourself, Trump did what Hillary did, would you be so forgiving?
If Trump was guilty of anything they have accused him of in regards to Russia that was a legitimate crime I have been on record numerous times in numerous threads stating my support for him would end.

The question you as is not applicable to Trump because, For him to do what the Clintons have done would have taken a career in politics, strong-arming and other deal-making that allowed them to get to the position they are in to feel that they were untouchable and above the law. Trump has been in politics for less than 3 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,435,501 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
You don't see why an investigation into Clinton's actions while serving as Secretary of State would be treated different than a counter intelligence investigation into a foreign nation's interference with a U.S. election and links/coordination with candidate Trump's campaign.

Comey had choices to make in July. Some might have been better for Clinton, some worse.

Same in October. For example, shut up and let the Weiner story leak. Would that have been better or worse for Clinton ? He helped Clinton by 'clearing her'' before the election.
More nonsense. All Comey needed to do was follow DofJ and FBI policy. And that said he simply had to keep his mouth shut. And if he felt he had to talk about Clinton then he could certainly have decided to talk about potential problems with the Trump campaign and the Russians.

Comey is a volunteer in all of this. There is nothing he was required or even chartered to do.

And beyond any reasonable doubt he influenced the election against Clinton which he was absolutely required not to do. 20 years in jail would be suitable punishment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:33 PM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,127,694 times
Reputation: 6136
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
More nonsense. All Comey needed to do was follow DofJ and FBI policy. And that said he simply had to keep his mouth shut. And if he felt he had to talk about Clinton then he could certainly have decided to talk about potential problems with the Trump campaign and the Russians.

Comey is a volunteer in all of this. There is nothing he was required or even chartered to do.

And beyond any reasonable doubt he influenced the election against Clinton which he was absolutely required not to do. 20 years in jail would be suitable punishment.

Everybody knew Hillary was under criminal investigation for espionage, this was not a secret.

On the other hand, the Russians investigation was a counterintelligence investigation, which is classified information, so Comey could not talk about it legally.

With that said, there were leaks about the Trump campaign being under investigation during the election. In fact, I remember threads being posted on here about.

I think you should do some research into why Comey said he made his public announcement in July 2016.

Comey said he had information that Loretta Lynch was compromised.

The IG said the information about Lynch is still highly classified, and he is working to get the classification issue resolved so the information can be shared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:34 PM
 
Location: The 719
18,107 posts, read 27,581,208 times
Reputation: 17430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
What specifically did they do to take down Trump, seems to me if that was their motive they did a horrible job. No one has been able to point to any details of any actions on their part, emails are not actions.The thrust of this investigation was the handling of Clintons emails, on that count I don’t see anything of substance just the same old arguments.
Just the same old arguments and he got his ass escorted from the FBI today, finally!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
...seems to me if that was their motive they did a horrible job.
You can say that again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
...seems to me if that was their motive they did a horrible job.
And again

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
...seems to me if that was their motive they did a horrible job.
Yup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
...seems to me if that was their motive they did a horrible job.
Ok, and again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
...seems to me if that was their motive they did a horrible job.
Why?

Because Trump and We kicked they ASS!

:gloat:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:43 PM
 
20,895 posts, read 8,703,450 times
Reputation: 14592
Considering the really damning evidence that will be coming out in the next IG Report about the FISA warrants which will indicate Obama was complicit in the fake Russia Trump setup, I don't see how any prosecutor will let anyone off the hook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:52 PM
 
11,185 posts, read 6,533,346 times
Reputation: 4628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Sorry but you need more than an article about Meadows from the conservative tree house. Even if true employees referred for discipline does not equate to some conspiracy.
Meadows is one of the Reps who knew the IG report concluded that McCabe lied multiple times. He'll be right about who he unmasked today.

It doesn't take much for a small group of like-minded key investigators and decision-makers to steer an investigation toward a desired outcome. They might fail, or only get some of the results they want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,435,501 times
Reputation: 8828
Basically a compendium of lies


Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Everybody knew Hillary was under criminal investigation for espionage, this was not a secret.
Source?

Quote:
On the other hand, the Russians investigation was a counterintelligence investigation, which is classified information, so Comey could not talk about it legally.
Source?

Quote:
With that said, there were leaks about the Trump campaign being under investigation during the election. In fact, I remember threads being posted on here about.
Source?

Quote:
I think you should do some research into why Comey said he made his public announcement in July 2016.
Source?

Quote:
Comey said he had information that Loretta Lynch was compromised.
Source?

Quote:
he IG said the information about Lynch is still highly classified, and he is working to get the classification issue resolved so the information can be shared.
Source?

Stacking it higher and deeper does not change the basic nature of your argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 07:15 PM
 
20,895 posts, read 8,703,450 times
Reputation: 14592
Gowdy on fire, lays it all out for even the DimDems and presstitutes to understand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOl1BcrlekM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 07:17 PM
 
20,895 posts, read 8,703,450 times
Reputation: 14592
Jim Jordan of Ohio has taken lessons from Gowdy. He did a great job.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYFTXqWfa2U
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2018, 07:24 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,996 posts, read 49,412,263 times
Reputation: 55120
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
Gowdy on fire, lays it all out for even the DimDems and presstitutes to understand
Gowdy deserves to be AG but would love to see him selected to SCOTUS one day. The man is brilliant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top