Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why do you want me to wade through 246 posts?????? What are you afraid of?
My requests of you were very simple.
1) in one or two words, tell us who "your people" are.
2) Surely you have the sources to back up your accusations. Or do you?
It's not Ben who is the coward, it's YOU. And it's not Ben who is the "sick POS", it's....
Here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
Sure, I’m not going to go searching his entire Twitter page again but whenever two people he doesn’t like are in a debate he uses terms like Iran-Iraq war redux saying he wishes both sides would be destroyed in the process (despite one side invading the other with the help of his favorite president). He went more in depth once saying how the world would have been better if both sides were destroyed, etc.
Even in dumb circumstances like pop culture debates I’ve seen him mention it as a joke. It’s not a joke to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
No he just twists facts and speaks fast. He knows little about health insurance, and less about net neutrality. He should stick to SJW facts.
As for emotions, I personally get angry at BS for making fun of the war that 100s of thousands of my people died and claiming he wished it have gone worse for us. The man is a pathetic POS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
First she’s a social democrat, not a socialist.
Secondly Ben is a horrible human being, read about his worldview, he sees every issue as an excuse to fight for the establishment. Police violence, the war on drugs, the war on terror, imperialism, corporatism, he passionately defends them all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
Yeah, Ben is Godzilla, just like the latter, he loves butchering innocence. Have you seen his rhetoric on the war in Iraq, or his comments on Reagan’s illegal wars, or how he doesn’t see Palestinians as worthy of life: https://www.creators.com/read/ben-sh...rab-population
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
1. It is, Shapiro is no different Buckley and the dozens of commentators who came before him
2. Shapiro is an emotional man, he believes everyone must support the state, that takes an incredible amount of faith and an emotional connection to the subject matter to sustain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
No, Ben is just another propagandist for the state, it can do no wrong in his eyes.
Police brutality, it’s the black peoples fault, war on drugs? The answer is to support more jails and prisoners (costs tax payer money), drone strikes, illegal arms sales, etc. of course; our enemies are worse, we must stick up to them.
Any regulations, policies meant to help workers; awful he says, instead we need more defense spending (so contractors get more $).
Net neutrality, sides with the government and state backed telecom companies without knowing anything about the issue, as he proved in his video on it.
He’s a propagandist who believes the state can do no wrong, there is nothing new about him.
I'm thinking that she's the darling of dems just like the way Palin was initially for the repugs, until she started to speak too much. All of that 'breath of fresh air' crapola wears off real fast when you realize that there ain't much going on in the background.
That applies to both of those highly misinformed people.
I’d love to see it too , wouldn’t you ? Of course she’ll never do it .
Since she’ll only stay in the safe space of liberal media where they give her softball questions and she still screws up .
—-
I don't get it. It sounds like a silly stunt. He's a commentator, right? Why would any politician want to debate a commentator? Candidates debate other candidates. That's the way it works. Haven't you noticed?
I'm thinking that she's the darling of dems just like the way Palin was initially for the repugs, until she started to speak too much. All of that 'breath of fresh air' crapola wears off real fast when you realize that there ain't much going on in the background.
That applies to both of those highly misinformed people.
Are you a republican?
Or are you one of those moderates who think people who criticize state terrorism and and state corporatism are extremists?
Did this political wanabee ever go to any school where education was taught?
She wants all these "free for everyone" programs.
How does she acquire the funding for these programs, like the multi trillion dollar medicare for everyone idea?
Her answer is to raise taxes.
Well, if taxes are raised, I guess these "free" programs aren't free at all.
This broad makes dumber and dumber look like college professors.
Bob.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
You contradict yourself. You claim she wants "free" programs and then complain she wants to pay for them. I should take you seriously?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo302
Pknop, are you legitimately having difficulty understanding the point calguy is making multiple times quoting the word "free"?
You can't seriously be that dense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
Please, explain to me why. You simply replied with lame insults. Many think this is a valid type of response but it is not but it makes it easy to understand why so many like Shapiro.
It's not my job to make sure you are able to understand simple conversation, but, okay;
Calguy used quotes to emphasize the ironic use of the word, "free".
I did not offer any insults, I'm legitimately amazed at your lack of comprehension.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussiehoff
You simply showed that you didn't understand his point. Perhaps watching a little more may have helped you.
Ben Shapiro is an extremely well-read, Harvard educated lawyer, and very skilled at civil debate. But this sounds like a desperate attention grab.
But hiding behind friendly media outlets to make outlandish statements without being challenged, demonizing opponents with slander, and refusing invitations to a civil debate, shouldn't be rewarded with being elected to tax-funded public office.
That's what the title for TV show "Face the Nation" was implying, for example. Politicians exhibiting terrible social skills and preaching to the choir exacerbates the division in the country.
I'm not a big fan of Obama's presidency, but in his 2008 campaign, he had debates with "the other side" on Fox News and campaigned in red states, reasoning with "Joe the plumber" and other skeptics. The Democrats need more of Obama's behavior, and less of Hillary's "deplorable" behavior.
I don't get it. It sounds like a silly stunt. He's a commentator, right? Why would any politician want to debate a commentator? Candidates debate other candidates. That's the way it works. Haven't you noticed?
I keep pointing that out. But when have facts ever stopped a GOPer?
I don't get it. It sounds like a silly stunt. He's a commentator, right? Why would any politician want to debate a commentator? Candidates debate other candidates. That's the way it works. Haven't you noticed?
Exactly. If he's that hot to debate political candidates - perhaps he should run for office.
It's not my job to make sure you are able to understand simple conversation, but, okay;
Calguy used quotes to emphasize the ironic use of the word, "free".
I did not offer any insults, I'm legitimately amazed at your lack of comprehension.
There is no lack of comprehension. There is a lack of a valid argument against the idea of people being able to access affordable health care when they get sick.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.