Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Her naming an eyewitness and placing him in the room where the alleged attack took place speaks volumes. The alleged witness Mark Judge is quite the character himself...
If, as seems likely, the whole thing is a plot to damage Kavanaugh's reputation just enough to prevent him from being appointed to the SC, then Judge was likely named as a witness specifically to produce reactions like the above. The smear team wanted a way to highlight the fact that Mark Judge and Kavanaugh were friends.
If, as seems likely, the whole thing is a plot to damage Kavanaugh's reputation just enough to prevent him from being appointed to the SC, then Judge was likely named as a witness specifically to produce reactions like the above. The smear team wanted a way to highlight the fact that Mark Judge and Kavanaugh were friends.
Kavanaugh did not do much for his reputation every time he lied under oath to Congress. And there were multiple times that have been easily proven. He's a tool.
Everything was green light for this new Judge saw him being congratulated with his lovely wife and 2 daughters, until this individual female from decades ago decided to come forward.
I do not understand her Motive.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,637 posts, read 12,561,414 times
Reputation: 10497
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc
Her naming an eyewitness and placing him in the room where the alleged attack took place speaks volumes. The alleged witness Mark Judge is quite the character himself...
Thing is-the WITNESS says she's lying. Many women that have known and worked with him over 30 years says this doesn't fit him. No mention was made of him until his confirmation hearing-and that accusation is by a partition that has been a Trump protester and opponent since before the election. No, no reason to be skeptical. None at all.
This is as believable as, say, the story about Schumer raping his daughters friend. No surprise the TDS afflicted believe it at face value.
Doesn't the fact she names a witness means it's less likely that she's lying on Kavanaugh? If this woman wanted to lie on Kavanaugh then it seems more likely that she would have said that Kavanaugh attacked her somewhere where there was no witnesses. This would make for an easier lie on her part. At some point this witness would be found.
Even though the witness has denied Ford's accusations from what I've seen of him in the news he seems a little strange.
So her lack of a believable story, complete with details and objective proof, makes her story more believable?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
