Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-26-2018, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,209,414 times
Reputation: 16747

Advertisements

Though Americans are promised a republican form of government, wherein they are sovereigns without subjects and endowed with rights government was instituted to secure, they're embroiled in the aftermath of the revolution of 1933, that gave birth to the People's Democratic Socialist Republic of America.

For the most part, Americans have had no constitutional government for 85 years.
. . . .
Senate Report 93-549
https://archive.org/stream/senate-re...3-549_djvu.txt
War and Emergency Powers Acts
"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years (as of the report 1933-1973), freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."
FREEDOMS ... GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION ... HAVE BEEN ABRIDGED BY LAWS ... UNDER EMERGENCY RULE ...

Constitutional U.S.A. (1789 - 1933) R.I.P.

 
Old 09-26-2018, 07:45 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,955,882 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJmann View Post
Canada has more than 36 million people actually.


And California alone has 39 million people.
 
Old 09-26-2018, 08:31 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,493,436 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty011 View Post
And California alone has 39 million people.
And that would be the second dumbest statement so far this thread.
 
Old 09-26-2018, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Toronto
669 posts, read 321,195 times
Reputation: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by carcrazy67 View Post
Good thing she didn't need a hip or knee replacement....she'd be waiting a long time! In all seriousness, most of my Canadian friends are happy with the "everyday" healthcare they receive. However, the bigger issues....not so much. They have said it's a good place to be if you are relatively healthy or dying. In between, with issues common to aging, they are lacking.
The big thing here is Prescriptions as noted. My first job in 2004 out of school was as a client rep who's HR function was outsourced to Toronto where I live. My first eye opening exposure to the monstrosity that is US Health Care.

It was here I learned that Prescription was actually more important for the average person, especially those older. The one client (US Dow Jones) had multiple companies underneath, which included highly paid rocket scientists, would actually defer their retirement to maintain their lower premium (also subsidized by their employer) health benefits. More importantly their prescription.

Bill Clinton was right when he said it's the bureaucracy that adds to the significant cost of healthcare which I saw first hand as the amount of data transfer points to get service was truly multi-stage and complex. People were also denied immediate coverage at the hospital if a small detail was wrong, which was an error somewhere along those data transfer points. It would take weeks before it would resolve itself, leaving many with deferred care or actually being billed and the pressure on them to pay until it was corrected.

Basically, a huge part of the US economy is also what contributes to its soaring costs and inefficiencies.
 
Old 09-27-2018, 02:08 AM
 
Location: Canada
14,735 posts, read 15,043,276 times
Reputation: 34871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Then why does 90% of the Canadian population live within a few miles of the U.S. border?

Fact - its because the flat, even geographic terrain there was where it was easiest and most practical to build the cross country railroad from the east coast to the west coast. Then of course homestead farms and then small towns and eventually cities grew up along side the railroad for practical commercial purposes. The railroad was the main access to commerce and industries and fastest method of transportation of people and merchandise and livestock and grains and whatever other resources that needed to be moved across the country. So that's where the towns and people were.

And 90% of the Canadian population does not live within a few miles of the U.S. border. But 75% of the Canadian population does live within 200 miles north of the Canadian border because the cities and their industries grew up along the railway which also happens to have been built within 200 miles of the Canadian border. Then logically the Trans Canada Highway was also built next within that same corridor.

See, it has nothing to do with wanting to be in close proximity to whatever country lies on the other side of the Canadian border. The country on the other side of the Canadian border is irrelevant to how Canada functions and where Canadian people reside. It's all about what is geographically most convenient for Canadians to build their infrastructures across the continent from coast to coast.

And if you think about it carefully, considering the way it inadvertently worked out it's also not a bad idea to have the majority of the nation's population living almost in a straight row across the country all so close enough to the border. Just like the national anthem says - "Oh Canada, we stand on guard for thee". That way the citizens all stand together on guard against more unwanted forays and incursions from the other side of the border the same way they did 200 and 150 years ago and now again within the past couple of years since Trump has stirred up so much trouble.

.

Last edited by Zoisite; 09-27-2018 at 02:16 AM..
 
Old 09-27-2018, 04:23 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,211 posts, read 2,243,832 times
Reputation: 2607
I worked for 2 years for a Vancouver company and my experiences with the Canadian health system was not a good one....I ended up having to drive to my house in Seattle to get proper treatment. I'm still of the opinion that the Canadian health system is a good one and we should look seriously at adopting something similar but I wasn't impressed.
 
Old 09-27-2018, 05:05 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by carcrazy67 View Post
Good thing she didn't need a hip or knee replacement....she'd be waiting a long time! In all seriousness, most of my Canadian friends are happy with the "everyday" healthcare they receive. However, the bigger issues....not so much. They have said it's a good place to be if you are relatively healthy or dying. In between, with issues common to aging, they are lacking.

I always ask, if Canada's health care is so good, WHY do so MANY have EXTRA PRIVATE health care insurance?
 
Old 09-27-2018, 05:11 AM
 
Location: Canada
6,617 posts, read 6,545,986 times
Reputation: 18443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
Fact - its because the flat, even geographic terrain there was where it was easiest and most practical to build the cross country railroad from the east coast to the west coast. Then of course homestead farms and then small towns and eventually cities grew up along side the railroad for practical commercial purposes. The railroad was the main access to commerce and industries and fastest method of transportation of people and merchandise and livestock and grains and whatever other resources that needed to be moved across the country. So that's where the towns and people were.

And 90% of the Canadian population does not live within a few miles of the U.S. border. But 75% of the Canadian population does live within 200 miles north of the Canadian border because the cities and their industries grew up along the railway which also happens to have been built within 200 miles of the Canadian border. Then logically the Trans Canada Highway was also built next within that same corridor.

See, it has nothing to do with wanting to be in close proximity to whatever country lies on the other side of the Canadian border. The country on the other side of the Canadian border is irrelevant to how Canada functions and where Canadian people reside. It's all about what is geographically most convenient for Canadians to build their infrastructures across the continent from coast to coast.

And if you think about it carefully, considering the way it inadvertently worked out it's also not a bad idea to have the majority of the nation's population living almost in a straight row across the country all so close enough to the border. Just like the national anthem says - "Oh Canada, we stand on guard for thee". That way the citizens all stand together on guard against more unwanted forays and incursions from the other side of the border the same way they did 200 and 150 years ago and now again within the past couple of years since Trump has stirred up so much trouble.

.
Yes! all that, plus being closer to the border means we are closer to the equator, compared to the northern reaches of Canada. We already often have 5-6 months of winter weather where I live, and I hate winter.

Why would I want to move further north and suffer even more winter weather?
 
Old 09-27-2018, 05:43 AM
 
2,908 posts, read 3,874,059 times
Reputation: 3170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
That literally took one minute. SMH

Oh, so sorry, its much better to stay and feign outrage over how unjust and horrible it is to live in the US.

Libs just love to complain.
 
Old 09-27-2018, 05:48 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,232 posts, read 18,584,601 times
Reputation: 25806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
FAnd 90% of the Canadian population does not live within a few miles of the U.S. border. But 75% of the Canadian population does live within 200 miles north of the Canadian border because the cities and their industries grew up along the railway which also happens to have been built within 200 miles of the Canadian border. Then logically the Trans Canada Highway was also built next within that same corridor.

See, it has nothing to do with wanting to be in close proximity to whatever country lies on the other side of
It has A LOT to do with wanting to be close to the U.S. Much of it ECONOMIC, and much of it CLIMATE. Some of it is cultural.

Quote:
According to the 2011 Canadian Census, more than 23 million people, almost 70 percent of the population, live in urban areas. Ninety percent of the Canadian population lives within 100 miles of the U.S. border.
over 90% of the population of Canada lives within 100 miles of the U.S. border. – Blooms Mag
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top