Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All those house hearings on this, direct unredacted access to the warrants and they never noticed that there wasn't court hearing. They needed Judicial Watch to nail this down.
By the way they don't keep a transcript of the FISA Court hearings.
There have been so many hearings on the FISA warrants for Page but this never came out before, Gowdy and Nunes staff had unredacted access to the warrants, IG investigations all but missed this. We needed to hear the real story from Judicial Watch and Fox News, I see Jason Chaffetz found his calling on Fox News. What an embarrassing bunch.
Not liking a source should be motivation to prove them false.
The problem with being inside the collective bubble is the information and the messenger is not allow in unless it agrees with those in the bubble. That makes them no different than a one cell organism with the brain activity of a feedback loop.
Breaking out of that mold is the lefts challenge and no one can take them serious until they do.
Not liking a source should be motivation to prove them false.
The problem with being inside the collective bubble is the information and the messenger is not allow in unless it agrees with those in the bubble. That makes them no different than a one cell organism with the brain activity of a feedback loop.
Breaking out of that mold is the lefts challenge and no one can take them serious until they do.
I would hope that you would have more than a Fox News Video based on a Judicial Watch FOIA, maybe even post the actual document (imagine that!) that they attained with said statement. But they didn't do that did they, so how do we disprove something that doesn't exist.
I would hope that you would have more than a Fox News Video based on a Judicial Watch FOIA, maybe even post the actual document (imagine that!) that they attained with said statement. But they didn't do that did they, so how do we disprove something that doesn't exist.
Its been release to the public and there have been threads on it. You could find it if you wanted too but it is easier to say it doesn't exist. "imagine that!". Its the whole purpose of FOIA, info. release !!!
In case you missed it, here is another memo :
Mueller's investigation is OVER. Mueller blew it up with Weissmann as Bruce Ohr named him as a source receiving dossier
Its been release to the public and there have been threads on it. You could find it if you wanted too but it is easier to say it doesn't exist. "imagine that!". Its the whole purpose of FOIA, info. release !!!
In case you missed it, here is another memo :
Mueller's investigation is OVER. Mueller blew it up with Weissmann as Bruce Ohr named him as a source receiving dossier
Its been release to the public and there have been threads on it. You could find it if you wanted too but it is easier to say it doesn't exist. "imagine that!". Its the whole purpose of FOIA, info. release !!!
In case you missed it, here is another memo :
Mueller's investigation is OVER. Mueller blew it up with Weissmann as Bruce Ohr named him as a source receiving dossier
So in other words you haven't seen the information from the Judicial Watch FOIA but you know its "everywhere".
Everyone who wants to see it has the opportunity. Get a grip on reason and get in the game.
Did you see this memo ? Mueller's investigation is OVER. Mueller blew it up with Weissmann as Bruce Ohr named him as a source receiving dossier
At this point, you’re just trying to trick yourself. I understand it’s a rough time for you to watch trumps presidency imploding. You do whatever you need to do to cope.
You make the point that is obvious to anyone.
You don't want equal justice. You want specific justice and specifically anyone GOP.
Nowhere do you want any crime investigated even when there is evidence for it that is greater than what started a SC investigate of Trump.
I wouldn't be bothered if everyone who is implicated in corruption was being investigated. That's not the case. I have no problem putting anyone in government, in jail. To give those who are corrupting government a pass and turn a blind eye to it b/c of party or position is the objection.
The bipolar left is in one breath saying law enforcement is bad and ICE need to be abolished or remade. In the next breath the DOJ & FBI hero's and the more corrupt they are the better they like them.
Well said! To add to this I'd bet these same people would scream bloody murder if a special prosecutor investigation was opened up looking at a bunch of Democrats.
Ohhhhh nooooooo,hat we can't have that even if some would/could be guilty as hell THAT kind of investigation is (enter your negative comment here).
Investigate BOTH sides and whatever comes out deal with it! Clean house (both of 'em)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
