Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:28 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Exactly.

Republicans trying to convince everyone that we shouldn't believe what their leaders say.

"Yea, our politicians promise us they are going to overturn Roe v Wade and SSM but they don't really mean it! So you Dems should stop worrying about it."

Really?

LMAO



Is this like Democrats want to take our guns away. But when you dig deeper it is only a few dozen?
Or is it exactly like everyone says?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,054,775 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it is not, and it scares the crap out of you that what I'm saying is true. There is no semblance of privacy when a public DA can prosecute a perp for fetal homicide without the mother's consent. Roe, based on the issue of privacy, is a serious flawed ruling.
Your ridiculous argument doesn't scare me one bit because it will have no bearing against Roe v Wade.

No one is going to go there.

If your argument had any weight at all it could be used to strike down a myriad of privacy laws, not just Roe v Wade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:33 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Your ridiculous argument doesn't scare me one bit because it will have no bearing against Roe v Wade.
Guess again...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:33 PM
 
2,260 posts, read 1,139,191 times
Reputation: 2837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
https://mavenroundtable.io/theintell...7Ueb8w/?full=1



Plenty of conservatives approve of abortion when it is to their benefit, don't kid yourself.

Plenty of conservative women have abortions and plenty of conservative men are glad when they do.

There are going to be a lot of men paying a HUGE price $$$ if Roe v Wade is ever overturned.
They would find ways to do it protected by their fellow conservative cash backed buddies. They'll keep that on the downlow just like their affairs.

Its the knuckle dragging low class conservatives that blindly believe their leaders are actually practicing what they preach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,054,775 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Is this like Democrats want to take our guns away. But when you dig deeper it is only a few dozen?
Or is it exactly like everyone says?
Democrats have never suggested or promised to ban gun ownership, not even close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,179 posts, read 2,132,512 times
Reputation: 7944
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILRef View Post
Yep. Live and let live is really the best mindset to have. As long as you're not affecting anyone else's rights, then do as you please. That used to be the liberal platform. Unfortunately, they have gone all in on identity politics, big government, and violence (RESIST!).
Personally, live and let live is a good way to do it, unfortunately, there are too many who want you to share their group think, regardless if you believe it or not. If it were up to me, I’d give everyone space to live their own productive lives and not be dependent on big government or group think. But there are too many who want to see you march in lockstep with their views. Resist indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:50 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Democrats have never suggested or promised to ban gun ownership, not even close.
Then it is just a few oddballs in the party.
In the case of R v. W it is not the entire Party. It is a few oddballs... Gaining support. BIGLY
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,054,775 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Open-D View Post
So "to slaughter" or "to NOT slaughter" is only the mother's call? We're not talking about getting boob implants, or ear piercings, we are talking about slaughtering the most-innocent among us. Hell, they can't even fight back, run, crawl, scream or cry, and you think that there is nobody else "at interest" other than the mother? The FIRST roll of government is to protect the people, including little tiny ones who can't even pay taxes yet.

Well at least it is Liberals who are eating their young long before they hit the voter rolls.
The only one who should get a say about carrying a pregnancy to term is the one who could die from carrying that pregnancy to term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,488 posts, read 1,644,820 times
Reputation: 4136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
The only one who should get a say about carrying a pregnancy to term is the one who could die from carrying that pregnancy to term.
I agree, the mother should always have the final say!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2018, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,054,775 times
Reputation: 22092
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Then it is just a few oddballs in the party.
In the case of R v. W it is not the entire Party. It is a few oddballs... Gaining support. BIGLY
The intent to overturn Roe v Wade is part of the official Republican Party Platform.

That did not get there because of a few oddballs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top